My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111412
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 111412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:18:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Blank stated that based on his experience and some research, generally <br />speaking, in California, if a contract says that a business will use best efforts to <br />accomplish something, the business will practically go bankrupt to make it happen. He <br />expressed concern that this language could potentially expose businesses to very high <br />levels of liability. <br />Ms. Harryman agreed and said that she has seen "best efforts" used that way, similar to <br />"use all efforts unless commercially infeasible" or something like that. <br />Ms. Ott noted that staff is recommending the removal from the document of the phrase <br />"to the best of their ability" because it does not have a definition. <br />Acting Chair Blank inquired if there would be public notification of any proposal for <br />modifying pre- existing Conditional Use Permit conditions when they come before the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Ott replied that this modification would be done at the staff level, and the action <br />would be included in the Zoning Administrator Actions report. She added that following <br />current procedure, that action can be appealed to the Commission. <br />Acting Chair Blank inquired if the notification area of the proposed change would be <br />within a 300 -foot or 1,000 -foot radius. <br />Robin Giffin explained that the action would go to the Planning Commission and the City <br />Council as part of the Actions of the Zoning Administrator report, with an opportunity to <br />appeal. She added that no notification is done for this. <br />Acting Chair Blank noted that it would be on an agenda that would come to the <br />Commission, but the public would not be notified of the change unless they subscribe to <br />the Planning Commission agenda. <br />Commissioner O'Connor requested verification that it would be noticed if it were <br />appealed to the Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Ott said yes. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Laura Olson, a Pleasanton resident and Executive Director of Pleasanton Downtown <br />Association thanked everyone for recognizing the importance of these Guidelines and <br />for supporting the PDA and the Task Force through this process, especially <br />Commissioners Narum and former Commissioner Pentin for their participation on the <br />Task Force. She reiterated that the PDA supports the original PDA and EVC <br />recommendations and looks forward to having these adopted and implemented. She <br />indicated that there is a tremendous amount of advantage for the Downtown to have <br />these Guidelines in place, to have an even playing field, and to let businesses know that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2012 Page 9 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.