My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111412
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 111412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:18:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Labus then showed the village green concept with the public street going around <br />and the resort-style design and community space living off of it with plenty of room for <br />lounging and socializing. He referred to the tot lot to the rear between the community <br />building and the four -story building, and the arcade where there is an open breezeway <br />that connects the buildings from the back, the tot lot area, all the way through the indoor <br />amenities, as well to the front of the project. <br />Mr. Labus then presented some of the features in terms of materials and the <br />architecture, noting that they broke down the scale of the building utilizing different scale <br />building elements and puffing the roof forms, the opposing gables both two- and <br />three - stories, very interesting colors and materials, including the stucco and adobe style <br />brick veneer. He stated that breaking it down to final level detail, they have detailed <br />things like the wood like trim, the window surrounds and trims of the decks and <br />windows, the pre -case type trim around the windows and some of the bellybands and <br />stone accents there, ornamental decorative railings, pot shelves, awning frames, <br />window details, and then finally some canvas awnings there to take the scale of this <br />larger building and break it down to mid -level and then down to a finer level to create <br />that pedestrian scale on the street. He noted that this gives that walkable feel along <br />West Las Positas Boulevard and helps bring it down to the smaller scale to be <br />compatible with the buildings across the street. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that the Guidelines indicate that there should be a <br />minimum of 75 percent of the ground floor units with access onto the street, internal <br />street, paseo or open space. She inquired why there are 16 instead of 23. <br />Mr. Zahedani stated that not all of the units have direct access points. He noted that <br />with respect to the buildings that front onto West Las Positas Boulevard, there is a berm <br />which presents a problem for having direct access points. He pointed out that they tried <br />to work around that and have sites or locations where the berm does not exist and <br />residents can walk around. He added that if this is a big issue for the Commission or <br />staff, there may be ways to find flexibility to have either pony gates or some sort of <br />entrance at the balcony or patio level on the ground floor of some of the other units. <br />James Paxson, General Manager of Hacienda Business Park Owners Association, <br />stated that he was pleased to be working with a project that is so well- designed and the <br />progress on the project in terms of what the applicant has done with some of <br />Hacienda's preliminary comments. He indicated that they have done an informal review <br />of the project several weeks ago and that some of the changes before the Commission <br />night were a response to some of the Association's initial comments. He noted that <br />after tonight's Work Session, the design will be taken back to their Design Review <br />Committee for its formal response before it comes forward for the regular Planning <br />Commission public hearing. He stated that he has been really impressed with the <br />response of the applicant, the creativity in design for such an unusual lot and for <br />basically what is very much an infill project in Hacienda. He noted that the Association <br />has also been working with the applicant on the architecture of the project and that it <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2012 Page 21 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.