My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111412
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 111412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:18:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
involved, instead of coming up with some number that reflects an average over some <br />period of time that is an absolute, which takes the reality out of it. <br />Acting Chair Blank stated that he does not disagree with staff that it is very practical; <br />however, he thinks it is the Commission's task to intellectualize about it. He noted that <br />the problem is when there is a resident who has what is perceived to be a real problem, <br />there has to be a standard that very specifically says 60 dBA, 70 dBA, or 74 dBA is the <br />standard. He added that if there is no definition of how that standard is going to be <br />measured, then there is no standard. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he also sees the problem with residents perceiving <br />a problem and wanting to take action against a major violator, and business owners <br />wants that wiggle room to work in their favor. <br />Acting Chair Blank stated that this can work both ways: he does not want to see <br />residents disadvantaged because they cannot lodge an appropriate complaint and have <br />enforceability; and he also does not want to see businesses disadvantaged because <br />they are saying they are within the Guidelines. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if staff sees any disadvantages to creating some kind of <br />guideline about self- monitoring for businesses in the Downtown. She noted that it <br />seems like it might cut down on the complaints if businesses needed to self- monitor. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the only disadvantage is that some of the people who will take <br />advantage of this whole package may be a nightclub that is just breaking even. He <br />indicated that he does not think the equipment is all that expensive, but it is more the <br />time it takes to do it. He noted, however, that he does not think this it is an <br />overwhelming burden on a business. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she is thinking about noise - monitoring for businesses <br />that have outside amplified music, not for businesses such as Clover Creek. She <br />inquired if staff would be amendable to adding language in that regard. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he does not think it is unreasonable. He noted that during the <br />field trip, even the iPhone measurement was pretty good in the middle range. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she understood having businesses come into <br />compliance with these Guidelines would be done at the staff level and that staff is not <br />doing anything outside these Guidelines but simply get the businesses up to the <br />standard. <br />Ms. Ott replied that was correct. She added that anything out of the standard would <br />have to be handled as a Conditional Use Permit, which would then come before the <br />Commission. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2012 Page 14 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.