My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062712
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 062712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:27 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:59:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: Commissioner Narum <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Blank and Pentin <br />The Minutes of the June 13, 2012 were approved, as submitted. <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />There were no members of the audience wishing to address the Planning Commission. <br />4. REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Janice Stern advised that there were no revisions to the Agenda. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />a. P12 -0774, Shape Up! Boot Camp and Fitness <br />Application for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a gymnasium /fitness <br />instruction facility in an existing tenant space located at 1257 Quarry Lane, <br />Suite 115. Zoning for the property is PUD -1 (Planned Unit Development — <br />Industrial) District. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that in staffs email to the applicant, Exhibit C, there was a <br />question about the traffic fee but that she did not see any reference to it in the staff <br />report. <br />Ms. Stern explained that staff does not discuss traffic fees in Planning Commission staff <br />reports because it is an ordinance issue that applicants need to pay. She noted that <br />there is an appeal system in place wherein the applicant can appeal, generally first to <br />staff and then to the City Council. She added that this is not usually something that the <br />Planning Commission deals with. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if the traffic fee for this application is consistent with the <br />other applications of this nature in Valley Business Park <br />Ms. Stern said yes. She stated that the fees are based on the difference between what <br />was previously calculated for the previous use and what is calculated for the new use. <br />She added that sometimes the fees vary because the previous tenant had paid a larger <br />amount of fees, but the fees are based on the existing use. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 27, 2012 Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.