My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 032812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 2:52:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:46:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. Public Trails — Does the Commission wish to provide any comments on the <br />trail proposal? <br />Chair Pentin stated that, of course, he would love to see that open space dedication be <br />provided. He noted that it was a wonderful piece of property, and having lost the open <br />space dedication is disappointing for a trails person like himself. He added that <br />retaining the Class C trail along the side, the north /south route, is wonderful, but he <br />would like to find a way to eventually bring back the Class A trail planned east/west <br />through the property sometime in the future, maybe in the next ten years, when regional <br />trails really do connect. He noted that it would be really disappointing if this huge piece <br />of land is locked off, especially with the possibility of development from the other <br />properties coming forward with Lund Ranch and Foley. He stated that he does not <br />know if the staging areas will ever be brought back, but he would just love to see the <br />project come back with some recognition and possibility of the trails being increased, of <br />having an easement for the trail if and when that time comes. <br />Commissioners Pearce and Olson agreed. Commissioner Pearce noted that was well <br />said, and she cannot add to that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor likewise agreed. He indicated that he is not as disappointed <br />with not having all this public open space, but admitted he could be very wrong. He <br />stated that he went up there once and thought the terrain was so steep, he could not <br />imagine that people were going to run too far off the trail. He noted that there were <br />certainly areas where it opened up a bit, but most of that 500 acres was steep enough <br />that he is not sure he would want to have people running all over the 500 acres. <br />Chair Pentin stated that up on Pleasanton Ridge Regional Park where the City shares <br />the space with the East Bay Regional Park District area, there are trails, such as the <br />Sinbad Trail, where one can go a couple of minutes on the tiered downhill and then just <br />keep going up all the time. He added that it is a wonderful exercise and there are lots of <br />beautiful things to see. He noted that he does not think that who use trails are really <br />concerned with how steep they are; it is having the ability to get out on them, both on <br />and off the trail. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she thinks it was more like having the open space. <br />Chair Pentin agreed that it is more the open space issue. He stated that there will not <br />be 30 trails in there as it was never designed or planned that way, but it would be <br />wonderful to have that access, especially the access connecting to other trails. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that with the proposed building envelopes, the open <br />space feel can be preserved, but if the City can get an easement for this Class A trail, it <br />would be worth looking at. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 28, 2012 Page 29 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.