PC 032812 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Narum stated that she had a comment on Commissioner O'Connor's concern about some of the houses along the road on top of the hill. She noted that while his comment was valid, she thinks that after grading is done, those houses would actually be a little bit lower and a bit off the road, so it would not be a road with houses right on it. Commissioner O'Connor stated that he was looking at the map, and some of the building envelopes come up and actually abut the road, so there is the possibility that a homeowner could request coming right up to the road, which would put the house at the peak because the road follows the peak. He indicated that he did not like the road there either and noted that he did not think the two larger lots would be an issue because the driveway goes down the topography; however, for the 20- or 30 -acre property, he did not see any reason for having the building envelopes sitting right on top of the ridgeline. Commissioner Narum stated that the topography on Lot 3 is a very steep hill falling off to the right where the building envelope is, which limits the location of the building envelope on the lot. Commissioner O'Connor stated that he did not want to have to draw the development plan for the applicant. He noted, however, that there were 51 homes there at one time, 15 or 20 of which were pretty prominent on top of the ridge; but there were another 30 homes or more that were not. He indicated that with 500 acres up there, the developers should be able to find a place to put a home that is not sitting on a prominent ridgeline. Commissioner Pearce stated that in some instances, that might result in restructuring the lots. Commissioner O'Connor added that probably the road might also have to be restructured. Commissioner Olson indicated that he was concerned about the process here. He stated that to some extent, he thinks the cart is before the horse, and if the idea is to sell these lots to people who think they can further develop them, in other words, there is no interest in agriculture at all, then there needs to be disclosures indicating that is not a possibility. Chair Pentin stated that with respect to the location of the current pads in view of the previous proposal and the topography, it seems that the developer is making attempts not to get up on the ridges. He noted that it appears like the proposed plan follows the same route as the previous layout, and, therefore, he is not sure what the visibility is on the current plan versus which ones were visible and were not visible on the previous plan. He stated that from what he is seeing of the topography, it appears that the hills around these houses are the lower parts of the topography. He added that he is not familiar with the road in the sense of it running right along the top of that ridge, and he would like staff to address Commissioner O'Connor's statement that the houses on that PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 28, 2012 Page 20 of 33