Laserfiche WebLink
store, which was truly a neighborhood store, and that they really miss it. He indicated <br />that like everybody else, he is here obviously to support this new store. <br />Mr. Heuer stated that he wanted to ask the appealing parties tonight some questions <br />and was shocked that they are not present. He stated that he wanted to know what the <br />issue was for them, if it was traffic, because he cannot believe that it will be that much <br />different than what the old Nob Hill generated. He asked if the issue is unions and what <br />the model of a local neighborhood store is because 99 Ranch, Gene's Fine Foods, <br />Fresh & Easy, and Trader Joe's are all non -union stores. He added that out -of -town <br />local neighborhood stores, such as Grocery Outlet and Whole Foods, or a big box, <br />Smart and Final, are all non -union as well. He further asked if the issue is the change <br />of operation or that it is an eyesore, as there is no change of operation and that it is now <br />an eyesore. <br />Mr. Heuer stated that he went online to look at WalMart's neighborhood store, and it is <br />bright, clean, crisp, attractive, and welcoming, and it looks a lot like these other stores. <br />He noted that the neighborhood loved Nob Hill, and the residents did not care if it was a <br />union or non - union. He added that he felt sorry for local officials who have to put up <br />with bullying from local unions. He asked the Commission to reject the appeal and not <br />to let the bullies have their way. <br />Al Phillips stated that he lives in Livermore and that his wife works in Pleasanton. He <br />indicated that this is more than just a discussion of WalMart moving in; this is more <br />about property rights, sales tax revenue, and supporting the needs of the community. <br />He noted that Mrs. Anderson has been making the payments here for the last couple of <br />years, and no one else has been making the payments on it. He added that WalMart <br />has put in a contractual agreement to lease the store, and there are outsiders trying to <br />prevent that from happening. He indicated that he supports the store as well as <br />Mrs. Anderson. <br />Kathy Stieg stated that she and her husband moved to Pleasanton in 1986 and started <br />their own business in 1996. She indicated that to her, this simply seems to be an <br />economic decision. She noted that the last time she drove through Downtown Main <br />Street, she was stunned at the number of vacancies. She added that when they first set <br />up their business in 1996, they were lucky to find a lease space Downtown, and now <br />there are vacancies everywhere. She stated that she cannot see any downside to <br />someone who wants to move into a building and to create jobs. <br />Robert Bacon stated that he has been in this town since 1966 and that first of all, he <br />would like to commend the Planning Commission for approving this project. He stated <br />that he thinks it is appropriate and it is good for the town. He added that bigger than <br />that is this is going to be a job- creating machine, not just the 75 or 95 jobs that are <br />going to be created on -site but related jobs for the businesses there. He noted that <br />these people will now be able to hire more people, who will then have more money to <br />spend someplace else. He added that it is a multiplier in the sense that when people go <br />in to buy a sandwich, someone will be making the bread; when they buy a dress, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 19, 2012 Page 6 of 15 <br />