Laserfiche WebLink
have been hurting since the closing of the Center's anchor tenant, Nob Hill, two years <br />ago. He indicated that he has read and re -read PUD 84 -4, the staff report, and the <br />application itself, and the appellants have provided no compelling detail or testimony <br />this evening upon which to challenge the Zoning Administrator's highly qualified <br />conclusion that the application is in fact, consistent with PUD 84 -4. He urged the <br />Commission to reject the appeal unanimously and send a message of certainty to <br />homeowners and business owners alike. He noted that in Pleasanton, those who follow <br />the rules and act in accordance with the law will be treated fairly and have the freedom <br />to exercise their rights within those laws, just as the owner of the Shopping Center and <br />WalMart have done. <br />Teralyn Fredricks stated that she lives, works, and is raising a family in Pleasanton. <br />She indicated that she has lived in Pleasanton for almost 20 years and owns two <br />restaurants in town, one in Meadows Plaza Shopping Center which has been there for <br />30 years and she has been there for 12 out of those 30 years. She stated that the <br />reason she is here tonight is because their shopping center is hurting with the loss of <br />their grocery store, and any further delays could cause undue hardship to all the small <br />businesses, the owner of the Center, the City's tax base, and folks looking for work here <br />in Pleasanton. She noted that she has been fortunate enough and has enough <br />resources to stay in business, but other businesses in the Shopping Center have not <br />been as lucky. <br />Ms. Fredricks stated that WalMart chose its position to offer lower prices to its consumer <br />and asked what is not to love about lower- priced groceries for the same product that <br />one can get from the competitors. She added that WalMart will be offering health care, <br />401 K plans, and 75 -100 jobs in the City of Pleasanton. She noted that WalMart will be <br />located on Santa Rita Road, a main thoroughfare in and out of Pleasanton, and people <br />drive by that shopping center every day. She added that WalMart would have the same <br />amount of traffic as when Nob Hill Foods was there, so there should not be any <br />additional traffic impact. <br />Ms. Fredricks stated that the subject building has been used as a supermarket for over <br />20 years and that all WalMart is asking to do is change the name to Neighborhood <br />Market. She added that any restoration to be done to the supermarket should not <br />create any significant impacts. She indicated that this is a huge opportunity for the area <br />and noted that neighborhood residents have talked to many residents in the area and <br />taken polls and positions throughout the last couple of years since Nob Hill left, and <br />over the last six months, hundreds of them have indicated that they are in favor of the <br />new grocery. She concluded by saying that WalMart has the right to operate in the <br />Shopping Center under the terms spelled out in PUD 84 -4, and what they are asking is <br />to allow this to be carried through with a new supermarket. <br />Jim Cence stated that he has been a resident of Pleasanton for over 40 years. He <br />indicated that there are two things that concern him: one is that he likes to pick the <br />supermarket that he can shop at, and he does not want someone to tell him where he <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 19, 2012 Page 4 of 15 <br />