My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 020812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
internal discussion about this with a very thoughtful approach, and he would like to give <br />the Police Chief the opportunity to address the Commission. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she has another amendment and would like to present <br />it before the Chief speaks so he can comment on that as well. She noted that when <br />they were at the club, she did not see the A -frame sign on the dress code, and she <br />believes that people standing in line should see and know that before they get to the <br />entrance and not be admitted. She indicated that she would like to see a condition <br />that requires the operator to have a sign on the dress code both at the site and on <br />the club's website. <br />Commissioner Blank accepted the amendment with a further modification that the <br />sign be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community <br />Development. <br />Commissioner Narum accepted the additional language. <br />Chief Spiller stated that they have had a lot of discussion with the owner /operator, who <br />has been very cooperative with the PD staff, and have been receptive in terms of <br />working through the PD's concerns, including working on modifying the security plan. <br />With respect to the capacity, Chief Spitler stated that as they have looked at the <br />incidents that have occurred, the density or intensity of attendance at the club is kind of <br />directly related to those problematic events. He continued that in looking at their <br />response capability without significant impact to the community, the number of 300 or <br />less is the number they came up with that's manageable for the area within the <br />business as well as managing the outflow at the end of the evening. He noted that <br />while nightclubs and businesses like this can impact law enforcement resources, which <br />is not at all unusual, the incidents that occurred when they were in the 500/600/700 <br />capacity actually significantly crippled the PD's ability to respond to other calls for <br />service. He added that the City's PD relied on mutual aid protocols throughout the area <br />of the county to not only manage Pleasanton's calls for service, but to get appropriate <br />resources to this establishment. He noted that with his experience and in having <br />worked very closely with his management staff that has been responsible for this <br />project, he is very confident that 300 or less is that number in terms of our ability to <br />manage this operation. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he understands that Option 3 is the preferred option, <br />but would like to explain that the reason he made the motion for Option 4. He indicated <br />that Chief Spiller will have noted that all the Commissioners have stated that they do not <br />look at increasing the occupancy lightly and that he would ask that the Chief be brought <br />back to the Commission before the Commission increases that number. He added that <br />if the owner or operator of the club goes a month or two months or whatever time period <br />decided upon and has a perfect record, then maybe the Commission could let them <br />increase to 350 or some incremental number. He indicated that he does not want to <br />sound too metaphysical, but he believes that people can create positive environments, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 8, 2012 Page 18 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.