Laserfiche WebLink
back on the table, they would have to file an appeal, which they submitted a few days <br />later. <br />Mr. Lopez reiterated that during the City Council meeting, Mayor Hosterman stated that <br />the details did not have to be worked out that night and that they — the Perrys and the <br />Lopezes and not the attorneys — could work it out later. He added that then they got the <br />bids and were informed that the language of the condition does not say that they have <br />to install a skylight. <br />Ms. Lopez stated that in her opinion, there was never the intent to install a skylight. She <br />noted that the Council approval was given back in February, and the best opportunity <br />for anybody to see the lighting in the home was during the summer months when there <br />is most lighting, at which time the Lopezes' home was already erected. She further <br />noted that they got the bids in November, when typically there is a lot of rain. She <br />added that this never went beyond what the Council had agreed upon that they — the <br />Perrys and the Lopezes — were to work it out. <br />Rodney Lopez stated, in summary, that they are not saying they are not going to pay. <br />He stated that they will pay the funds as specified in the option, but they want the <br />skylight to be installed first. He added that they felt that during the process, a lot of the <br />arguments were being brought up just to put up obstacles, and they wanted to make <br />sure that if this is a real issue, then the Perrys should take care of the issue and the <br />Lopezes take care of their portion. <br />Ms. Lopez stated that they are here to mitigate the Perrys' issue and concern about <br />shadowing or shading. She added that they are willing to accept that responsibility by <br />paying up to the $2,500, but they want it for what the intention is, which is to install a <br />skylight, and not for any other purpose. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that it is unfortunate that the wording was not a little <br />sharper from the beginning, but nobody anticipated this. He indicated that as the <br />Commission has mentioned in the past, disputes between neighbors, especially next <br />door neighbors, are always difficult. He stated that he believes that in the interest of <br />putting this matter to bed and quieting things down, the wording of the condition should <br />remain with no changes made. He noted that it has been more than a year, and this <br />matter should have come up at the time the condition was written and not this late. He <br />indicated that he originally thought that he would like to see the skylight installed, but <br />now that the construction is all done, the skylight may not be the best solution and there <br />may be other ways to spend the money to make things easier on the neighbors. He <br />indicated that he would not have a problem with the Perrys using the fund for something <br />different. He added that he thinks this matter needs to be put to bed so things can start <br />to heal. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 25, 2012 Page 13 of 19 <br />