My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011112
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 011112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 12:08:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. Eliminate the particular measure which the City incorrectly included in emission <br />reductions from future fuel price increases. This was considered a little bit on the <br />leading edge with about 19,000 metric tons applied to the CAP, possibly because <br />the City did not really have to do anything to get that reduction. The District was <br />more comfortable with not having that in the CAP and having strategies instead. <br />3. Strengthen Mitigation Measure TDM2 -9, a transportation demand management <br />program. Staff felt it was important to act on one of the specific <br />recommendations made, which was fairly insignificant in terms of what it requires <br />the City to do. <br />4. Change `'incentivize" to "require" in all land use measures addressing <br />development of codes related to density, infill, mixed -use, and transit - oriented <br />development (TOD). One of the City's goals from the beginning was not to have <br />a CAP that was filled with new regulations but to collaborate with the community <br />and the business community. <br />Mr. Smith then displayed two pie charts, the first showing the initial draft CAP <br />projections with Commercial and Municipal and Residential Energy adding up to four <br />percent, and Public Education and Engagement at 13 percent; and the second showing <br />the final CAP where Public Education and Engagement had been eliminated with most <br />of it going into Energy Efficiency and Generation and some into Land Use and <br />Transportation. <br />Mr. Smith then presented the CAP adjustments made as follows: <br />• Municipal development codes (TDM2 -9) were modified to require new <br />non - residential projects over a certain size and configuration to implement at <br />TDM program capable to reducing weekday peak - period vehicle trips by at least <br />20 percent. <br />• Calculations of the City's Green Building Ordinance (EC1 -2) were corrected to <br />require new and significantly remodeled buildings to incorporate measures from <br />Build It Green (BIG) green building guidelines. <br />• Implement PG &E Partnership Program (EC2 -2), a multi -year integrated resource <br />strategy that incorporates PG &E's Core, Third Party, Local Government <br />Partnership, Demand Response, Clean Air Transportation, Distributed <br />Generation, and other pertinent programs. <br />• Lead and participate in Solar Cities Program (ER2 -2), a customer - assistance <br />program designed to facilitate the purchase and installation of photovoltaics and <br />other energy- efficient technologies for residential, commercial, and municipal <br />facilities. <br />Mr. Smith then displayed a chart demonstrating the GHG Reduction Potential in both <br />the Draft and Final CAP. He also presented a summary of the Draft CAP Projections <br />and the Final CAP Projections. He noted that the City will still meet the AB32 target <br />with a buffer of 5,121 MT CO2e. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 11, 2012 Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.