Laserfiche WebLink
law.4 <br /> The state has considered different approaches regarding the use of medical marijuana in <br /> multifamily housing situations.5 However, as the state has not adopted a specific rule <br /> regarding this issue, the City is not preempted from adopting its own ordinance. <br /> In considering the health interests of residents of multifamily rental apartments, as well <br /> as concerns regarding persons with medical conditions who can benefit from smoking <br /> medical marijuana, the following options are available: <br /> Option 1 — Accommodate Inside. On June 20th, it was proposed to allow medical <br /> marijuana smoking inside of a unit as a reasonable accommodation when a tenant <br /> "...provides written documentation sufficient for a landlord to determine that such person <br /> needs to smoke medical marijuana for medical or therapeutic purposes and no alternative <br /> means of ingestion or delivery are available...". In introducing Ordinance No. 2164 on <br /> June 20th, the Council adopted Option 1 as a reasonable accommodation, but added the <br /> requirement that a person seeking such an accommodation also document the inability <br /> to smoke outside. (See Attachment 1, pg. 5, §9.26.030.B.3.; this Option 1 was part of <br /> Ordinance No. 2164 that was modified and introduced on June 20th.) <br /> Option 2 — Accommodate Outside. Also discussed on June 20th was allowing a tenant <br /> to smoke medical marijuana outside of the tenant's unit, but still within the area of the <br /> apartment complex where smoking is allowed (if the apartment owner has voluntarily <br /> established such an area). This Option 2 is also proposed as a reasonable <br /> accommodation when the tenant demonstrates that the tenant cannot ingest or receive <br /> medical therapeutic benefits of marijuana in another manner. The text for Option 2 is <br /> shown in Attachment 1 (see pg. 6, in §9.26.030.B.3.). <br /> Option 3 — Prohibit. A complete ban on medical marijuana smoking is also an option. <br /> As marijuana is already included in the definition of "smoke" (see Attachment 1, pg. 4 in <br /> §9.26.020.H.) both medical marijuana and recreational marijuana would be subject to the <br /> smoking restrictions in the ordinance. To clearly prohibit medical and recreational <br /> marijuana smoking in a designated smoking area (if the apartment owner has voluntarily <br /> established such an area) proposed language for such prohibition is shown in Attachment <br /> 4 See Cal. Health &Safety Code §11362.79: "This article does not authorize a qualified patient ...to <br /> engage in the smoking of medicinal cannabis under any of the following circumstances: <br /> (a) In a place where smoking is prohibited by law. <br /> (b) In or within 1,000 feet of the grounds of a school, recreation center, or youth center, unless the <br /> medicinal use occurs within a residence. ..." <br /> 5 In 2016, legislation (AB 2003, Wood)was proposed to limit landlords' ability to"...impose conditions or <br /> prohibitions that effectively deny a patient the ability to vaporize medical marijuana, as recommended by <br /> a physician for medical purposes...". That legislation was not adopted. Also in 2016, the California <br /> Department of Fair Employment (DFEH) considered an interpretation of"reasonable accommodation"to <br /> include: "For purposes of this article, any request for a waiver of a"no smoking" rule in order to utilize <br /> medical marijuana in compliance with the Compassionate Use Act of 1995 (Cal Health & Safety Code <br /> §11362.5 et seq.) shall be deemed reasonable and shall be granted, unless the nature of the housing <br /> facility prohibits it, such as a sober living or recovery home." This DFEH interpretation was also not <br /> adopted. <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />