My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17961
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2017 11:19:07 AM
Creation date
7/26/2017 11:19:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/18/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17961
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(including, but not limited to, curb, gutter/ stormdrain system, sidewalk, street <br /> lights, etc.); <br /> f. agree to (or vote in favor of) any future proposed annexation of the property to <br /> the City; <br /> g. obtain City design review approval for any future proposed addition or <br /> alteration to the property requiring a building permit from the County; and <br /> h. does not represent City approval of any future subdivision of the property. <br /> B. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo)'s approval of an out of area service <br /> agreement and owner(s) payment of all City and County processing fees; <br /> C. The residence(s) on the property generally must be within the City's urban growth <br /> boundary; <br /> D. The (proposed) use of the property is consistent with the General Plan and Happy <br /> Valley Specific Plan . <br /> SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes staff to accept applications for annexation from <br /> property owners within the unincorporated Happy Valley area, subject to the requirements of the <br /> General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan, and payment of all requisite City, County, and <br /> LAFCo processing fees and costs related to such applications. <br /> SECTION 4. The factors described in Section 2, above, are not required to be <br /> considered in emergency situations involving an existing or pending public health and safety <br /> threat as determined by the Director of Engineering or his or her designee, LAFCo policies and <br /> California Government Code §56133(c). <br /> SECTION 5. Finds that the rescission of Res. 16-828 and adoption of the specified <br /> factors for case-by-case consideration of applications by properties in the unincorporated Happy <br /> Valley area for City water service and/or City sewer service are exempt from the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)as there is no possibility that the actions may have a significant <br /> effect on the environment per Title 14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15061(b)(3), as future applications for <br /> service will each be subject to separate environmental review unless exempted as an individual <br /> utility connection per Title 14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15268(b)(4). <br /> PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at <br /> a regular meeting held on July 18, 2017. <br /> I, Karen Diaz, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing <br /> resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of July, 2017, <br /> by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Olson, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> Abstain: None <br /> MINA ' / <br /> aren D -z, City Co <br /> APP'OVED AS TO FORM: <br /> Daniel G. Sodergren, Ci y Attorney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.