My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17960
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17960
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2017 2:52:20 PM
Creation date
7/25/2017 2:52:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/18/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17960
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br /> Findings <br /> 1. That the City of Pleasanton is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan <br /> Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act(TDA)Article 3 <br /> funds,nor is the City of Pleasanton legally impeded from undertaking the project(s)described in <br /> "Exhibit B"of this resolution. <br /> 2. That the City of Pleasanton has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) <br /> described in Exhibit B. <br /> 3. A review of the project(s)described in Exhibit B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent <br /> matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant <br /> to the successful completion of the project(s). <br /> 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects <br /> described in Exhibit B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that <br /> will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. <br /> 5. That the project(s)described in Exhibit B comply with the requirements of the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act(CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). <br /> 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s)of the project(s) in Exhibit B, the sources of <br /> funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). <br /> 7. That the project(s)described in Exhibit B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; <br /> and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the <br /> purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle <br /> safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian <br /> facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by <br /> the City of Pleasanton within the prior five fiscal years. <br /> 8. That the project(s) described in Exhibit B is included in a locally approved bicycle,pedestrian, <br /> transit,multimodal, complete streets, or other relevant plan. <br /> 9. That any project described in Exhibit B that is a bikeway meets the mandatory minimum safety <br /> design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual. <br /> 10. That the project(s)described in Exhibit B will be completed before the funds expire. <br /> 11. That the City of Pleasanton agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of,the project(s) and <br /> facilities described in Exhibit B, for the benefit of and use by the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.