Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 17 - <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> CONFIRMING THE IMPOSITION OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON 4719 <br /> ORANGEWOOD COURT, PLEASANTON (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 941- <br /> 1001-047-00) FOR THE COSTS OF ABATEMENT, INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES, <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND COSTS, ALL INCURRED IN A NUISANCE <br /> ABATEMENT ACTION ON THE PROPERTY <br /> WHEREAS, from 2009 to 2012, responding to citizen complaints, the City inspected the <br /> property at 4719 Orangewood Court (the "Property") and discovered various Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Code and state law violations; <br /> WHEREAS, administrative citations that addressed the violations were issued to the <br /> property owners but the property owners failed to address the nuisance conditions and/or health <br /> and safety violations described in the citations or pay the administrative fines; <br /> WHEREAS, due to the continued substandard condition of the property, on August 3, <br /> 2012, the City filed a petition for appointment of receiver in the Superior Court of California, <br /> County of Alameda (City of Pleasanton v. Spitzer, Case Number RG12642206); <br /> WHEREAS, after a court hearing on September 12, 2012, the Court found that the <br /> Property was substandard, a public nuisance, and maintained in a manner that violated state <br /> building standards, Health and Safety Code and Pleasanton Municipal Code; <br /> WHEREAS, the Court further found that the violations were extensive and of such a <br /> nature that the health and safety of any occupant of the Property, the neighboring residents, and <br /> the general public was substantially endangered; <br /> WHEREAS, the Court held that the City properly issued the Property owners a notice to <br /> repair and abatement order and the Property owners failed to comply with the notice and <br /> abatement order; <br /> WHEREAS, the Court further held that the Property's substandard conditions were likely <br /> to persist unless the Court appointed a receiver to take possession of the Property and <br /> rehabilitate it and the Property owners were given notice of the City's intent to file a petition for a <br /> receiver's appointment; <br /> WHEREAS, the Court's orders included the reimbursement to the City for its <br /> enforcement costs, including but not limited to inspection costs, investigation costs and attorney <br /> fees, costs in bringing the receivership action, and unpaid administrative citations; <br /> WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code §38773.5, Health and Safety Code <br /> section 17980.7, and Pleasanton Municipal Code sections 1.04.110, 9.28.180 and 20.32.020 <br /> (Chapter 9), the attorney fees, investigation costs, prosecution costs, and enforcement costs <br /> can be made a special assessment upon the property once confirmed by the City Council and <br /> thereafter recorded with the Alameda County Recorder's Office; <br /> WHEREAS, in accordance with Pleasanton Municipal Code section 20.32.020, Section <br /> 9.05 (Chapter 9), immediately upon its being placed on the assessments roll, the assessment <br /> shall constitute a special assessment against and a lien upon the Property; <br />