Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Councilman Cairo and seconded by Councilman Harding that Resolution <br />No. 65 -47, authorizing the staff to execute the right -of -way agreement with Southern <br />Pacific Railroad Company involving the corssing of the Arroyo Del Valle Interceptor <br />Sewer at Ray Street, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />Matters for the information of the Council <br />Mr. Fales stated that the City of Pleasanton has been asked by the City of Livermore <br />III whether the Council, Chamber of Commerce officials and our planning consultants can <br />meet with Livermore officials and representatives of the Southern Pacific and Western <br />Pacific railroads for lunch on March 26 at Castlewood Country Club to discuss the <br />possible merger of Western Pacific and Southern Pacific railroad facilities through <br />the Valley. <br />The City Council expressed agreement with this proposed meeting and asked Mr. Fales to <br />contact them again at a later date regarding this date. <br />Mr. Fales reported that the Valley Sewer Study Committee meeting held this date it <br />was proposed and unanimously approved that an invitation be extended to the Alameda <br />County Water District Board of Directors to a luncheon and a tour of the valley <br />facilities and each governmental agency sharing the expense of this function. Mr. <br />Fales stated that the date had not yet been set but at this time the Valley Sewer <br />Study Committee wanted confirmation from the member governmental agencies to share <br />the costs. <br />It was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman McWilliams that the City <br />Council was in favor of such a luncheon and tour and agrees to pay its share of the <br />expenses. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />Mr. Fales read a letter from Senator John W. Holmdahl, dated March 12th, addressed to <br />Mayor John Shirley of Livermore, Chairman of the Alameda Mayor's Conference with copies <br />to all mayors in the County, stating that the Senate Committee on Reapportionment <br />has scheduled a hearing for March 22nd at 9 :00 A.M. in Room 5007 of the State Capitol <br />Bldg. in Sacramento. This hearing will be directed toward reapportionment considerat- <br />ions involving Bay Area Counties, including Alameda County. <br />Senator Holmdahl's letter also, stated that any mayor wishing to testify or make any <br />presentation at that time should advise him as soon as possible. <br />Mayor Long stated that he would contact Mayor Shirley immediately. Discussion ensued <br />regarding the Citizens Committee for Balanced Representation. <br />After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by <br />Councilman McWilliams that Resolution No. 65 -48, urging a United States Constitutional <br />amendment providing that the several states may choose for themselves the manner in <br />which the State Legislatures shall be constituted, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION (second reading) were not scheduled for this meeting. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS <br />Councilman Cairo stated that Mrs. Brooks, representing the Pleasanton Elementary P.T.A. <br />had contacted him and stated that she was going to send some material to the City <br />Hall regarding a proposed City Calendor. Mayor Long stated that he had received this <br />material and would deliver it to Mr. Fales. <br />Councilman Cairo also asked permission to be excused from attending Council Meetings <br />from April 22nd to June 1st, 1965 because he was planning to be out of the United <br />States during that period. <br />Mr. Sturthers stated that this absence was excusable as long as the time elapsed did <br />not exceed 90 days. <br />