My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
GHAD
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
051617
>
GHAD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 11:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/10/2017 9:23:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
GHAD
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d) Residents of "The Preserve" sought an explanation of the prior annexation to <br /> the Laurel Creek GHAD of the Kolb Ranch and Oak Hill Estate developments <br /> due to concerns that those annexed areas appeared to have much steeper <br /> slopes, and thought that higher risk was thus assumed by the Laurel Creek <br /> GHAD. The City's geotechnical consultant, ENGEO, brought geotechnical <br /> maps from The Preserve, Kolb Ranch, and Oak Hill Estates, to show that <br /> while the annexed areas appear steeper, there are more documented <br /> landslide and earth movement risks within The Preserve, such that the <br /> respective risks are equivalent. In addition, because the areas have similar <br /> improvements needing the same type of maintenance and monitoring, the <br /> assessments for all 121 properties in the Laurel Creek GHAD are the same. <br /> e) Residents had general questions about what type of landslide would be <br /> repaired with GHAD reserve funds. They were advised that landslides in the <br /> open spaces not threatening structures, roads or utilities would generally be <br /> left in their natural condition. And, landslides creating such threats would be <br /> repaired. Residents were further advised that if reserve funds were not <br /> sufficient, an additional assessment could be proposed; and GHAD law also <br /> allows for bond funding by assessments. <br /> f) In response to questions, staff explained that insurance for landslides was not <br /> available to private property owners, or to GHADs, and hence the need for <br /> reserve funds to accumulate by the GHAD assessments. <br /> Staff did not schedule another meeting this year because staff feels that the questions <br /> were answered in previous years and there were no public inquiries in the past year. A <br /> public notice will be sent to all the residents within each of the GHADs notifying them <br /> that this staff report is available on the City's website (in addition to the normal postcard <br /> noticing information). Any questions that arise from the residents reading the staff report <br /> will be addressed in the June 20, 2017 agenda report. <br /> Submitted by: Fiscal Review: Approved by: <br /> 1 A' /711/4//- k '(Z <br /> Stephen Ki k atrick Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of gineering Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachment: <br /> 1. Resolution — Oak Tree Farm <br /> 2. Resolution — Moller Ranch <br /> 3. Resolution — Laurel Creek Estates <br /> 4. Resolution — Lemoine Ranch Estates <br /> Page 6of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.