My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:19:56 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:17:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACMENT 12
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�_.. <br /> Provided to the Planning Commission <br /> From: Shoni Johnson After Distribution of Packet <br /> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:12 PM <br /> To: Kendall Rose; Date Distributed:iji41 � <br /> Cc: ERIC WEDEKING; Lori and Dave Dillon . <br /> Subject: Re:Agenda Packet for the August 10, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting <br /> Hi Ms. Rose, <br /> I wanted to make sure that you were aware there are other residents in Valley Trails who share <br /> similar concerns as I do regarding the below issues that I emailed you about yesterday. I am sorry I <br /> was unable to attend the meeting, but I am copying this blog from the Nextdoor Neighbor website to <br /> share with you. I hope that you can share this with the planning department to show that Connie Cox <br /> does not truly speak for everyone in Valley Trails. Unfortunately, she has a way to control the <br /> information, so it can sometimes appear that she is the only representative voice, but this is not the <br /> case. Please hear these additional concerns, as not everyone is able to attend the public <br /> meetings. Thank you. <br /> Shoni Johnson, VT Resident <br /> Community Bathroom 23i,ago <br /> Lori Dillon li•uni Valley Trails <br /> When I first heard about a public bathroom being asked of Ponderosa to build in our park I thought it sounded good. <br /> However, after really putting some thought into it, I have some reservations. <br /> 1) <br /> We had a homeless person sleeping in the bushes this summer and a bathroom could attract more of that behavior. <br /> 2) <br /> There probably will be some vandalism and graffiti, at times. <br /> 3) <br /> Our grassy areas are not large enough for organized sports to have practices. It is rare for any large groups to <br /> gather here. <br /> 4) <br /> We all live close to the park, so we can go home for a bathroom break. Personally, I would rather walk/run home <br /> than use a public toilet. <br /> 5)Could be an eyesore for people who live near the bathroom. <br /> These are a few reasons that I'm thinking about. My goal of posting this is to get people thinking about what we <br /> really would be gaining and if it is worth it. I'm not sure if anyone really has a strong opinion for it, or it just sounded <br /> good for Ponderosa to put some money into our park. This post is not intended to offend anyone. <br /> Shared with Valley Trails in General <br /> THANK 8 REPLY 14 <br /> Craig,Annet, Eric,and 5 others thanked Lori <br /> Cynthia Sandhu from Valle Trails2 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.