Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL SIATEROAL <br /> Provided to the Planning Commission <br /> After Distribution of Packet <br /> October 21, 2016 <br /> Date Distributed: !0i I-gill, <br /> City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Re: Evangelical Free Church/Ponderosa Homes, P16-1386, TRACT 8259 and P16-1385 <br /> Sometime in 2014 the formal Valley Trails Homeowners Association was disbanded. In early <br /> 2015, it became apparent that some sort of grass-roots effort would need to take place in <br /> order to provide a unified voice for our neighborhood, with particular regard to the then- <br /> rumored sale of the Evangelical Free property. <br /> I have never been involved in any HOA or grass roots organization. However, because of my <br /> background and profession, I was asked to help contribute to this new effort. Since 2015, I <br /> have shared responsibilities for organizing and seeking input from the Valley Trail <br /> neighborhood and acting as one of the key liaisons between the neighborhood and Ponderosa <br /> Homes. Our efforts are nothing more than an informal grass-roots organization, with all of us <br /> volunteering our time and personal resources to make this project work in the best way <br /> possible and have the greatest benefit for all concerned. <br /> Since the beginning of this new neighborhood 'organization', we have always been <br /> obsessively determined to be an inclusive body. Our role as liaisons has afforded us a unique <br /> opportunity to reach out to our neighbors for their views and opinions on how we, as a <br /> neighborhood, would like to see the parcel developed." <br /> Over the last two years, we have held a series of six neighborhood meetings. As we do not <br /> have any funds with which to operate, notice of those meetings were sent by email, social <br /> media and good old-fashioned word of mouth. We went through great lengths to make sure <br /> as many of our residents were notified as possible, in order to avoid anyone having any <br /> feelings whatsoever of disenfranchisement. We took the extra step in asking those receiving <br /> emails to talk with their neighbors to have them included on the mailing list, if they were not <br /> already. The intent and spirit of these neighborhood meetings was to gather all ideas, <br /> present updates and discuss the positives and negatives of this project. <br /> Several of the key liaisons also provided our personal contact information for those who were <br /> unable to attend a meeting, or who had ideas, concerns or questions. <br /> Altogether, this resulted in over 420 touch points; with a median participation and feedback <br /> approximately in the 80th percentile to date. <br />