Laserfiche WebLink
Staff notes that the City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the current proposal and found that the <br /> front yard setback of the homes facing Valley Trails Drive is adequate for vehicle backing and <br /> the distance does not create safety issues. <br /> Although the applicant declined to widen the pedestrian/bicycle connections, the 5-foot width <br /> proposed at the walkway connections to the public trail, at Street A and Street C in Exhibit B, <br /> matches the width of the proposed public sidewalks. Furthermore, increasing the width would <br /> require constructing retaining walls at the bio-retention areas adjoining the public park trail <br /> system. Widening the connection is discussed in more detail in the Analysis section of this <br /> report. <br /> Architecture and Design <br /> The Planning Commission expressed support for the overall architecture and design of the <br /> homes. The Planning Commission commented that the homes would be compatible with the <br /> homes of the surrounding neighborhood in terms of character and size, have been sensitively <br /> designed to minimize impacts to adjacent residences, and provide adequate variety in their <br /> architecture and design. However, the Planning Commission suggested that the front porches <br /> be deepened and the garages be further set back from the front of the house to reduce the <br /> presence of the garages on the street and improve the front elevation of the homes. The <br /> Planning Commission also commented on the setback of residences along Valley Trails Drive <br /> (suggesting greater setbacks). <br /> Response: The applicant is not proposing to widen the porches or set the garages further from <br /> the front of the house. The applicant redesigned Plan 3 to allow for a recessed wall at the left <br /> rear corner and the size of the garage was reduced. The total square footage of Plan 3 was <br /> reduced from 3,616 square feet to 3,385 square feet (a total reduction of 231 square feet). <br /> A minimum 23-foot building setback to the garage and front building wall are proposed for all <br /> plan types, which complies with the minimum front yard setback of the R-1-6,500 District. An <br /> additional "setback" is being provided from the street by the combined sidewalk and park strip, <br /> which results in a 33-foot separation from the park strip to the building wall. The porch setbacks <br /> are generally 15 feet or greater to the front property line or sidewalk. However, the depth of the <br /> porches has not changed. <br /> Additional Information Requested by the Commission <br /> 1. Survey of the Valley Trails Neighborhood residents regarding the community bathroom <br /> and meeting facility and its location. <br /> Response: On two separate occasions prior to the Work Session, Ponderosa hosted and <br /> invited occupants of the approximately 500 Valley Trails residences in the neighborhood <br /> to a community-wide open house to discuss development of the site. The first meeting <br /> occurred in June 2015 and the second meeting took place in April 2016. At each <br /> meeting, 50-60 people were in attendance. The VTAG also hosted community-wide <br /> meetings regarding the project design on at least two separate occasions prior to the <br /> Work Session. Feedback was provided to Ponderosa regarding the proposed land use <br /> change, density, home design and setbacks, and the proposed amenity package <br /> (clubhouse/restrooms, park improvements, traffic controls/measures, etc.). The applicant <br /> has declined to formally survey the residents because there has been extended out- <br /> reach to the neighborhood by both Ponderosa and the VTAG over the years to obtain <br /> P16-1386, P17-0155, PUD-113, & TRACT 8259; 6900 Valley Trails Drive Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 32 <br />