My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:20:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:16:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 9
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
However, staff believes the architecture could be marginally improved by setting the garage <br /> back further from the street and/or deepening the front porch if feasible. <br /> DISCUSSION POINTS <br /> A. Does the Commission support the General Plan Amendment to allow for residential <br /> development on the subject property? <br /> B. Does the Planning Commission support the construction of a club/meeting room building <br /> with restroom facilities within the project site? <br /> C. Are the overall site plan and street/pedestrian design layout acceptable? <br /> D. Are the home model types and elevation styles acceptable? <br /> E. What other information would assist the Planning Commission in its decision on the <br /> proposal? Do you have any other comments on the project? <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Notices for this work session were sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing maps as Exhibit G for <br /> reference. One resident, Marta Seda, expressed concerns regarding the traffic and circulation <br /> impacts of the proposed project in an email submitted to staff dated "July 21, 2016" (Exhibit H). <br /> At the time this report was published, staff has not received any other public comments about <br /> the project. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> Since the Planning Commission will take no formal action on the project at the work session, no <br /> environmental document accompanies this work session report. <br /> SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br /> Staff requests the Commission to review the proposal, hear all public testimony, and provide <br /> comments to staff and the applicant regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment, project <br /> alternatives, proposed site layout and access, and any other discussion points. <br /> Primary Authors: Natalie Amos,Associate Planner, 925-931-5613 or namoseocitvofpleasantonca.gov. <br /> Jay Lee, Associate Planner, 925-931-5610 or jleeacitvofpleasantonca.aov <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Steve Otto, Senior Planner <br /> Adam Weinstein, Planning Manager <br /> Gerry Beaudin, Community Development Director <br /> P15-0551, 6900 Valley Trails Drive Planning Commission <br /> 16 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.