Laserfiche WebLink
require the site to be rezoned to a PUD district to allow for flexibility in development standards <br /> (i.e., lot sizes, setbacks, and FAR). The second option would generate higher volumes of traffic <br /> and noise. The third option wouldn't require a General Plan amendment; however, a private <br /> school could generate higher volumes of traffic and noise within the established neighborhood. <br /> For option four, a new religious organization could occupy the existing church and propose to <br /> expand the building or use (i.e., daycare/preschool). This option could also generate higher <br /> volumes of traffic and noise. <br /> PROS AND CONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> Pros Cons <br /> The General Plan and zoning designation New development would be added to an <br /> would be consistent (i.e., residential). established neighborhood. <br /> The development plan, when revised, would The project would incrementally increase <br /> conform to the current zoning designation. traffic, noise, activity, and parking demand. <br /> The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Existing trees would be removed to <br /> recommendations for Valley Trails Park would accommodate the development. <br /> be installed by the applicant. <br /> The project is well-designed and would <br /> protect the character of Valley Trails <br /> Neighborhood by adding residential <br /> population on an underutilized site adjacent to <br /> a public park in an established neighborhood. <br /> CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE WORK SESSION <br /> Staff is presenting the Commission with development plans for the site (Exhibit B) for <br /> consideration and comment. This work session will allow the Planning Commission the <br /> opportunity to provide direction to the applicant and staff regarding any issues it wishes to be <br /> addressed prior to consideration of project approval. The areas noted below are where staff <br /> would find the Commission's input most helpful. <br /> General Plan Amendment <br /> The subject property currently has a General Plan land use designation of "Public and <br /> Institutional," which does not allow residential uses. Therefore, a General Plan amendment is <br /> proposed to change the existing land use designation to "Medium Density Residential." The <br /> Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation allows for 2 to 8 dwelling units <br /> per acre (du/ac) with a midpoint density of 5 du/ac. The General Plan indicates that residential <br /> projects which propose densities greater than the midpoint should be zoned PUD and include <br /> sufficient public amenities. The proposed project would have a density of 4.1 du/ac (37 lots on a <br /> 9-acre site) or 4.0 du/ac (36 lots on a 9-acre site), which is below the midpoint density. <br /> Therefore, PUD zoning and public amenities are not required for the proposed project. <br /> However, the applicant is proposing to provide amenities (please refer to the amenities section <br /> of this report). <br /> P15-0551, 6900 Valley Trails Drive Planning Commission <br /> 12 of 16 <br />