My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ponderosa Homes at 6900 Valley Trails Drive <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> e) Result in a determination by the wastewater X <br /> treatment provided which serves or may serve the <br /> project that it has adequate capacity to serve the <br /> project's projected demand in addition to the <br /> provider's existing commitments? <br /> f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted X <br /> capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste <br /> disposal needs? <br /> g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X <br /> regulations related to solid waste? <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> The City of Pleasanton has public utilities and infrastructure available to meet the <br /> planned buildout of the General Plan. Existing public utility systems, such as sewer, <br /> water, and stormwater facilities, are readily available at the project site. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> a-b,d-e) In terms of wastewater, no water quality violations currently exist. The <br /> project would not discharge any waste, other than domestic sewage, and all <br /> sewage would be discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system for ultimate <br /> treatment. As a result, the project would not exceed wastewater treatment <br /> requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Although the <br /> project would result in an increase in the generation of wastewater compared <br /> to the existing church use, sufficient sewer capacity is available for the project <br /> according to the City's Engineering Division. Therefore the project would not <br /> result in new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities. <br /> In terms of water, the project would result in an incremental increase in water <br /> use compared to the existing current use and would be required to implement <br /> the City's regulations for water conservation and abide by water use targets <br /> to avoid fees during drought conditions. <br /> Therefore, the project is not expected to require the construction of new <br /> water facilities or require the acquisition of new water supplies, and the <br /> potential impact would be less than significant. <br /> c) The project would include the construction of bioretention areas within the <br /> project site to treat stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces. This system <br /> 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.