My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approval by the City's Director of Community Development, but would be on Lot 11, <br /> proximate to the walking trail through the park. Dedicating the restroom and associated <br /> parcel to the City would require: 1) an amendment to the General Plan Land Use designation <br /> from Medium Density Residential to Parks and Recreation; and 2) rezoning from PUD-MDR <br /> (Planned Unit Development— Medium Density Residential) to P (Public). <br /> Option 2 may require additional agreements with the City regarding maintenance of the <br /> private clubhouse on Lot 11, if the clubhouse is constructed on a shared property line. <br /> Staff's recommendation is Option 2, consistent with the Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation. <br /> The Planning Commission expressed concern with two aspects of the public restroom <br /> proposal: the approval process; and the ongoing cost to maintain the restroom. Each point is <br /> discussed below. <br /> 1. Approval Process —The Parks Master Plan is the purview of the Parks and Recreation <br /> Commission, and ultimately the City Council. The Planning Commission expressed <br /> concerns about making a recommendation to the City Council on an aspect of the <br /> project that would typically come from another commission. Ultimately, because the <br /> restroom is being supported by a majority of the neighborhood and because it is being <br /> proposed with a private development application, the Planning Commission voted to <br /> support the restroom — knowing that the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed <br /> the other proposed park improvements, and that City Council would have the <br /> opportunity to review and consider the policy implications with the merits of the overall <br /> private development application. <br /> 2. Maintenance Costs — Several members of the Planning Commission expressed <br /> concern about taking on the ongoing costs of a public restroom in a neighborhood <br /> park. During deliberations, and as part of the motion, the Commission directed staff to <br /> consider the total cost of maintenance for a restroom. Up to that point, the applicant <br /> had offered to pay for 5 years of maintenance (which was valued at $25,000). <br /> For reference, and consistent with the Commission's direction, staff has completed an <br /> estimate based on yearly costs for a restroom in the Ken Mercer Sports Park. That <br /> number was multiplied by 30 (the estimated lifespan for a restroom), and a 2 percent <br /> annual escalator was included. The final cost over 30 years is estimated be $411,233. <br /> Staff has drafted a condition to attempt to bridge the gap between the $25,000 amount <br /> discussed previously, and the $411,233 estimate for restroom operations and maintenance <br /> over 30 years: <br /> Exhibit A.1, Condition No. 59: Should the City Council approve the installation of a <br /> public restroom(s) and associated land, which would be dedicated to the City and <br /> incorporated into Valley Trails Park, the applicant shall pay for the complete cost of a <br /> standard public restroom facility (estimated at $367,500) to design and construct the <br /> restroom, as well as payment in the amount of $200,000 to offset the ongoing <br /> Page 14 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.