My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff believes that the site layout provides adequate vehicular and pedestrian access and <br /> integration into the existing neighborhood. The interior streets, which are proposed to be <br /> public streets, and pedestrian connections along Valley Trails Drive and to Valley Trails Park <br /> help integrate the proposed development into the existing neighborhood. The vehicular and <br /> pedestrian connections also comply with the City's Complete Streets Policy and the overall <br /> street pattern is consistent with that of the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> The project is substantially consistent with the development regulations of the R-1-6,500 <br /> District in that the homes meet the front, side, and rear setbacks, FAR, and height <br /> requirements and most of the lots meet the minimum lot width and depth requirements. <br /> However, there are a few aspects of the project that do not meet the minimum requirements <br /> of the underlying zoning district: <br /> • Two of the five corner lots have a width less than the minimum 80 feet required for <br /> corner lots (Lot 1 is 68 feet in width and Lot 28 is 78 feet in width). <br /> • A minimum porch depth of 8 feet and a minimum porch width of 10 feet are required in <br /> order for a covered porch to encroach into the 23-foot front yard setback (a minimum <br /> 12-foot front yard setback for covered porches is allowed when these criteria are met). <br /> The proposed front porches range from 6 to 7 1/2 feet in depth and would be set back a <br /> minimum of 12 feet from the front property line. <br /> • There are five instances where homes do not meet the minimum building-to-building <br /> separation requirement (see Table 1): <br /> Table 1: R-1-6,500 Deficient Building-to-Building Separation Lots <br /> Lots Proposed Separation Minimum Required <br /> Between Structures Separation <br /> Lots 13 and 14 17 feet 20 feet <br /> Lots 16 and 17 14 feet 17 feet <br /> Lots 25 and 26 19 feet 20 feet <br /> Lots 26 and 27 17 feet 20 feet <br /> Lots 34 and 35 12 feet 17 feet <br /> Staff and the Planning Commission believes that relatively minor deviations from the <br /> development regulations of the R-1-6,500 District are acceptable in that the proposed siting, <br /> massing, and size of the units are appropriate for this site and would result in an attractive <br /> development for this area. Open space is integrated into the project, along with pedestrian <br /> connections to Valley Trails Park. The buildings would be in keeping with the scale and <br /> massing of the surrounding homes. <br /> Open Space and Amenities <br /> Open Space <br /> The proposal would not exceed the midpoint density for the site identified in the General <br /> Plan; therefore, dedication of land or amenities is not required. However, the applicant has <br /> offered to dedicate to the City a portion of "open space" land for public use adjacent to Valley <br /> Trails Park ("Parcel C"), if the City accepts the dedication of land and maintenance <br /> Page 12 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.