Laserfiche WebLink
The top ten strategies identified are: <br /> 1. Complete Parking Strategy for Transportation Corridor (Strategy 1.5.10) <br /> 2. Enhanced Time Restrictions (Strategy 1.4.1) <br /> 3. Wayfinding (Strategy 1.4.2) <br /> 4. Designated Employee Lots or Permits (Strategy 1.3.1) <br /> 5. Bicycle Access and Trail Connectivity Improvements (Strategy 1.2.1) <br /> 6. Private Lot Utilization for Weekends and Evenings (Strategy 1.5.3) <br /> 7. Identify Opportunity Sites for Surface Parking (Strategy 1.5.11) <br /> 8. Establish Transportation Demand Management Association (Strategy 1.1.3) <br /> 9. Short Term Bicycle Parking (Strategy 1.2.2) <br /> 10.Loading Zone time of day restrictions (Strategy 1.5.5) <br /> Implementation of Strategy 1.5.10, identified as the first of the top ten strategies, would <br /> require the preparation of a design and approval of funding for completing the parking <br /> and trail improvements along the Transportation Corridor. Although this would be a <br /> substantial effort, it is one of the more cost effective strategies for providing additional <br /> parking (estimated at $20,000 per space, including construction of multi-use trails, <br /> lighting, gathering areas and other amenities, but excluding land acquisition costs <br /> incurred at the time the City purchased the land and excluding technical studies). This <br /> strategy, if funded, can be implemented in the near-term. Staff is also proposing that final <br /> version of the plan revise this strategy as a two-fold approach, with the first step of this <br /> strategy (1 a) involving updating and finalizing the design of the transportation corridor; <br /> and the second step (1 b) involving proceeding with construction and implementation. <br /> Effectiveness of Strategies. Where research was available, Fehr & Peers added <br /> information on the impact of individual strategies to reduce parking demand or increase <br /> parking supply. This information has been added to Table 6 of the Parking Plan where <br /> warranted and is generally shown as a percentage range estimate. For example, <br /> Strategy 1.1.2 for a Transportation Information Center is estimated to decrease parking <br /> demand by 1 to 3%. <br /> New Strategies. Several new strategies have been added to Table 6 (Potential Parking <br /> Management Strategies): Strategy 1.5.11 (Identify Surface Parking Opportunity Sites) is <br /> to identify vacant or underutilized property that could be converted to public parking, and <br /> Strategy 1.5.12 (In-Lieu Parking Fees), references the in-lieu parking fee program and <br /> notes that in-lieu fees should be periodically reviewed and adjusted by the City Council. <br /> Strategy 1.3.5 (ADA Parking Supply Review) has been added so that the number and <br /> location of on-street ADA designated stalls can be periodically reviewed (please also see <br /> the Public Notice and Comments section of this staff report). <br /> Potential Parking Structure Site. In the Parking Structure Feasibility and Cost section of <br /> Chapter 4, the existing City-owned public parking lot on Peters Avenue has been added <br /> as a fourth potential parking structure site. The existing 85-space lot could potentially <br /> accommodate a 181-space garage, resulting in a net gain of 96 spaces, with an average <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />