My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
031417
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2017 10:16:04 AM
Creation date
3/9/2017 3:32:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/14/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Gonzales <br />From: <br />Subject: <br />Pleasanton City Clerk <br />FW: East Side Planning - Priority Planning <br />From: Steve Brozosky [] <br />Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 2:07 PM <br />To: Mayor and City Council < citycouncil @cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Subject: East Side Planning - Priority Planning <br />I ask the City Council to not yet make the East Side Planning a City Priority. <br />SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br />Provided to the City Council <br />After Distribution of Packet <br />Date <br />The City has approved a lot of housing recently and it is currently in a building stage. We have yet to see the impacts of <br />this housing boom in our city. 1 recommend we see what the impacts of all this housing is on our infrastructure. That <br />mostly includes traffic and schools. For schools, not just elementary schools but also middle and high schools. <br />We previously had a housing cap and the infrastructure in the city was designed around it. With no longer having a <br />housing cap we are finding that our infrastructure is being pushed and capacity exceeded. Mostly issues with traffic but <br />also with schools. While there is talk of this development possibly putting in an elementary school, we still have not <br />addressed what happens in the middle and high school levels. Before we plan for more housing, I ask that the City add a <br />priority item to analyze the school congestion and work on plans to handle what we have, and address what would need <br />to be done if more housing were to be added at the significant level of the east side. That planning should occur first. If <br />we plan for the East Side first, we do not yet know what the requirements will be. Since we have met the RHNA <br />numbers, no matter how much we disagree with them, there is no hurry to plan a new major subdivision at this <br />time. While the developer wants this now, that developer bought a piece of land on speculation and knew the risks. <br />The council previously made a commitment to the community that any planning on the East Side would go to a vote of <br />the people. I believe if you plan that area now, without us knowing the impacts of the approved housing, there is no <br />chance of an East Side plan to be approved by the voters. Just about everybody I speak with says we have too much <br />housing and our traffic and schools are way too congested already. Planning the East Side now will be a waste of time <br />and money for the city. <br />Best Regards, <br />Steve Brozosky <br />Click here to report this email as spam. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.