My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
020717
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2017 10:40:04 AM
Creation date
2/3/2017 4:38:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Thorne& Members of the City Council, and Planning Commissioners, <br /> Pleasanton already has 2000 plus housing units under construction or approved for construction. I think it is <br /> unconscionable to be considering adding more housing until we have had a chance to digest what is already on our <br /> plate. Pleasanton needs to put a pause on any more multi unit developments until we have seen the affect that all the <br /> current construction is placing on our roads,water, schools, etc. Proper planning should absolutely include some kind <br /> of time table that does not permit any large projects until we can determine that our infrastructure is well capable of <br /> handling even more stress. <br /> I do NOT want a General Plan amendment to allow for higher density housing along Stanley Boulevard. With Measure K <br /> barely passing just a short time ago, it seems inconceivable that the city is considering another large development so <br /> soon. We have already satisfied our RHNA requirement, and there is simply too much development happening already. <br /> Stanley is a gateway into Pleasanton,and we should not be considering a high density, zero lot line development where <br /> there is very little offset from the street. We want people to know they are entering Pleasanton; not Dublin. There <br /> should be a great many changes to this plan before the City Council or the Planning Commission considers moving <br /> forward. <br /> I urge all of you to vote down this development. Insist the developer come back with a lower density plan and give <br /> Sunflower Hill time to get their financing in order. Any development coming forward should guarantee that the low cost <br /> housing is built in tandem with the market rate housing. <br /> Thank you for considering my comments! <br /> John Carroll <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.