Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Thorne& Members of the City Council, and Planning Commissioners, <br /> Pleasanton already has 2000 plus housing units under construction or approved for construction. I think it is <br /> unconscionable to be considering adding more housing until we have had a chance to digest what is already on our <br /> plate. Pleasanton needs to put a pause on any more multi unit developments until we have seen the affect that all the <br /> current construction is placing on our roads,water, schools, etc. Proper planning should absolutely include some kind <br /> of time table that does not permit any large projects until we can determine that our infrastructure is well capable of <br /> handling even more stress. <br /> I do NOT want a General Plan amendment to allow for higher density housing along Stanley Boulevard. With Measure K <br /> barely passing just a short time ago, it seems inconceivable that the city is considering another large development so <br /> soon. We have already satisfied our RHNA requirement, and there is simply too much development happening already. <br /> Stanley is a gateway into Pleasanton,and we should not be considering a high density, zero lot line development where <br /> there is very little offset from the street. We want people to know they are entering Pleasanton; not Dublin. There <br /> should be a great many changes to this plan before the City Council or the Planning Commission considers moving <br /> forward. <br /> I urge all of you to vote down this development. Insist the developer come back with a lower density plan and give <br /> Sunflower Hill time to get their financing in order. Any development coming forward should guarantee that the low cost <br /> housing is built in tandem with the market rate housing. <br /> Thank you for considering my comments! <br /> John Carroll <br /> 2 <br />