My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
020717
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2017 10:40:04 AM
Creation date
2/3/2017 4:38:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Annette Brecheosen <br /> From: Pleasanton City Clerk <br /> Subject: Irby ranchVJ?,FLEZIERTIML <br /> Pros 9C to the C Co me <br /> Mar �',ustylbut on o". <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Ellen Holmgren o G- 7 <br /> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 9:39 AM Date <br /> To:jay flachsbarth Mayor and City Council <citycouncil @cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Cc: Adam Weinstein<AWeinstein @cityofpleasantonca.gov>;Jennifer Hagen <jhagen @cityofpleasantonca.gov>; <br /> Pleasanton City Clerk<pleasantoncityclerk @cityofpleasantonca.gov>; Brian Dolan<bdolan @cityofpleasantonca.gov>; <br /> Dan Sodergren <dsodergren @cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Subject: RE: Irby ranch <br /> Dear Jay Flachsbarth, <br /> Thank you for your email regarding Agenda Item 12, Irby Ranch and Sunflower Hill, on the City Council Agenda for <br /> February 7, 2017. <br /> This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the Mayor and City Council and the City Manager. <br /> Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> Ellen Holmgren,Administrative Assistant City of Pleasanton <br /> Original Message <br /> From:jay flachsbarth <br /> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 7:56 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council<citycouncil @cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Subject: Irby ranch <br /> My position is clear,emphasis should be on SFH needs, reduce the 87 homes and increase the allocation to SFH, I don't <br /> know how that would work out. Here's an idea, let's build the SFH portion first,then build some#of additional housing <br /> units after the complex at Stanley and Bernal is built out. <br /> Jay Flachsbarth <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.