|
89 The project developer shall submit a dust control plan or procedure as part of the
<br /> improvement plans
<br /> Planning Division
<br /> 90 Development shall be substantially as shown on, Exhibit B, the development plans, dated
<br /> "Received January 23, 2017," as well as the following documents, except as modified by
<br /> these conditions
<br /> ® Green Building Checklist
<br /> "Tree Report" prepared by Hort Science, dated March 16, 2015
<br /> o "Transportation Assessment for Irby Ranch" prepared by Fehr & Peers, dated June
<br /> 17, 2016
<br /> o "Western Burrowing Owl Survey' prepared by Monk & Associates Environmental
<br /> Consultants, dated July 15, 2015
<br /> o "Delineation of Top-of-Bank and Edge of Ripanan, Arroyo del Valle" prepared by
<br /> Monk & Associates Environmental Consultants, dated June 16, 2015
<br /> o "Supplemental Slope Stability Analysis" prepared by Steven Ferrone & Bailey
<br /> Engineering Company, Inc , dated June 19, 2015
<br /> o "Environmental Noise Assessment" prepared by Charles M Salter Associates, Inc ,
<br /> dated February 11, 2015
<br /> © "TAC Analysis of Stanley Boulevard" prepared by Illingworth &Rodkin, Inc , dated
<br /> March 14, 2016
<br /> ® "3988 First Street & 3879 Stanley, Historic Evaluation" prepared by Architectural
<br /> Resource Group, dated April 27, 2015,
<br /> o "3780 Stanley Boulevard — Histonc Assessment' prepared by Valeria Nagel,
<br /> Architect, dated August 1, 2013
<br /> m "Due Diligence Level Geotechnical Investigation, 3780 Stanley Blvd" prepared by
<br /> Berlogar Stevens & Associates, dated December 11, 2012
<br /> ® "Geotechnical Investigation — Kaplan, Zia Properties" prepared by Stevens Ferrone
<br /> & Bailey Engineering Company, Inc , dated July 23, 2014
<br /> Minor changes to the plans may be allowed subject to the approval of the Director of
<br /> Community Development if found to be in substantial conformance with the approved
<br /> exhibits
<br /> 91 To the extent permitted by law, the project applicant shall defend (with counsel reasonably
<br /> acceptable to the City), indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers,
<br /> boards, commissions, employees and agents from and against any claim (including claims
<br /> for attorneys fees), action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified
<br /> parties and the project applicant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the project or
<br /> any permit authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the
<br /> City its attorneys fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation The City may, in its
<br /> sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice
<br /> 92 The applicant shall work with the Pleasanton Unified School District (PUSD) to develop a
<br /> program to offset this project's long term effect on school facility needs in Pleasanton in
<br /> PUD-110, Irby Ranch City Council
<br /> Page 17 of 31
<br />
|