Laserfiche WebLink
Tree assessment Hort Science, Inc <br /> Bonde Ranch City of Pleasanton Page 5 <br /> Tree Risk <br /> Tree risk evaluation is the systematic process of assessing the potential for a tree or one <br /> of its parts to fail and, in so doing, injure people or damage property All trees have the <br /> potential to fail The degree of risk will vary with the size of the tree, type and location of <br /> the defect, tree species, and the nature of the target <br /> All trees were assessed using the procedure outlined in A Photographic Guide to the <br /> Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas(N Matheny & J Clark 1994 (2nd edition <br /> International Society of Arboriculture Champaign IL) This method ranks the relative risk <br /> of trees within a given site Following a visual inspection of tree health and structural <br /> condition, the part of the tree most likely fail within the next 3 years was identified (e g <br /> branch, stem, or whole tree) as was the target that would be impacted The relative risk <br /> associated with each of the 65 trees was evaluated using the following components <br /> Failure potential (4 points) - identifies the most likely failure and rates the likelihood <br /> that the structural defect(s)will result in failure within the next 3 years The part of <br /> the tree most likely to fail was assessed using the following scale <br /> 1 - low-defects are minor (e g dieback of twigs, small wounds with good <br /> woundwood development) <br /> 2 -medium -defects are present and obvious (e g lean or bow that has <br /> developed over time, cavity encompassing 10-25% of the circumference of <br /> the stem, codominant stems without included bark) <br /> 3-high -compounding and/or significant defects present (e g severe lean, <br /> cavity encompassing 30-50% of the circumference of the stem, multiple <br /> pruning wounds with decay along a branch) <br /> 4 -severe-defects are very severe(e g partial uprooting of leaning tree, decay <br /> conks along the main stem, cavity encompassing more than 50% of the <br /> stem) <br /> Size of defect(4 points) - rates the size of the part most likely to fail Larger parts <br /> present a greater potential for damage Therefore, the size of the failure affects the <br /> potential for injury or damage The scoring system was as follows <br /> 1 -most likely failure less than 6" in diameter <br /> 2 -most likely failure 6 - 18" in diameter <br /> 3 -most likely failure 18 -30" in diameter <br /> 4 -most likely failure greater than 30" in diameter <br /> Target rating (4 points) - rates the use and occupancy of the area that would be <br /> struck by the defective part For the project areas, the following scoring was <br /> employed <br /> 1 -occasional use (e g lawn or open space) <br /> 2 - intermittent use (e g sidewalk, back yards) <br /> 3-frequent use (e g street parking) <br /> 4-constant use(e g residence) <br />