Laserfiche WebLink
® In some cases, alternatives may apply to both LAVTA and PPS, while others may be <br /> specific to one provider <br /> e Evaluations will look at program design and oversight of ongoing operations, including <br /> whether it is appropriate for PPS to continue to provide transportation services to older <br /> adults and ADA-eligible residents of Pleasanton and Sunol <br /> o All near-term alternatives will, unless directed otherwise, be fiscally constrained, <br /> representing marginal increases or reductions in operating costs <br /> O Based on preferences by the project management team staff, Nelson/Nygaard will look at <br /> growth scenarios—even unconstrained in the long term—where appropriate <br /> O Alternative will include innovative changes at either or both agencies, considering the <br /> latest advances in technology <br /> 8.2 Refinement of Aflternatves: Developing Preferred Alternative "Packages" <br /> The stakeholder and subsequent prioritization process in this subtask is essential to arnve at a <br /> satisfactory preferred package Such a process also allows the public, paratransit providers, and <br /> decision makers to clearly understand all of the alternatives that were considered, and how well <br /> each was found to reflect the needs of the community, along with any management and financial <br /> goals and objectives <br /> Any alternative requiring a change to LAVTA's paratransit policies must be properly vetted with <br /> significant public input, and in line with FTA and ADA requirements Nelson/Nygaard will <br /> ensure that any of the elements of the preferred package of alternative recommendations will <br /> comply with FTA ADA and Title VI requirements <br /> ® Preliminary alternatives will be presented to project management team staff and <br /> stakeholders <br /> ® Following presentation of alternatives to project management team staff and <br /> stakeholders, perform analysis of the potential ridership impacts and/or other impacts of <br /> more promising alternatives <br /> ® Analysis of relative cost and benefits will be emphasized <br /> ® "Package" the stakeholder designated priority alternatives into complete concepts to <br /> address the vanous elements discussed in previous subtask (program design alternatives, <br /> service delivery model alternatives, operations/procedural alternatives, etc ) assembling <br /> a set of what will likely be three to five comprehensive approaches to addressing gaps, <br /> managing programs, and providing services <br /> ® For each "package" an operating cost assumption will be developed, taking into account, <br /> to the maximum extent possible, cost-saving strategies, but also details costs in <br /> comparison with benefits in a measurable set of tables <br /> o Cost estimates and budgeting techniques will be based on clear and realistic <br /> estimates of costs that accurately reflect the local operating environment <br /> o The vehicle and facility requirements will be determined to support each scenario <br /> o Capital needs required to support each scenario will be identified <br /> 16IPage <br />