Laserfiche WebLink
To forecast the future price of renewable purchases, MRW considered a number of factors: <br /> • Researchers from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory(NREL) and Lawrence <br /> Berkeley National Laboratory(LBNL)developed a set of forecasts of utility-scale solar <br /> costs based on market data and preliminary data from other research efforts.3 Their base <br /> case forecast predicts a 3.8% annual decline in utility-scale solar capital costs on a <br /> nominal basis, from$1,932/kW-DC in 2016 to $1,652/kW-DC in 2020, with costs then <br /> remaining roughly constant in nominal dollars through 2030.4 Additional scenarios <br /> predict even steeper price declines, with the most aggressive scenario predicting an 11% <br /> annual nominal decline through 2020, with increases at the rate of inflation after that. <br /> • The federal Investment Tax Credit(ITC), which is commonly used by solar developers, <br /> is scheduled to remain at its current level of 30%through 2019 and then to fall over three <br /> years to 10%, where it is to remain.5 The federal Production Tax Credit, which is <br /> commonly used by wind developers, is scheduled to be reduced for facilities <br /> commencing construction in 2017-2019 and eliminated for subsequent construction.6 The <br /> loss of these credits would put upward pressure on prices. <br /> • NREL and LBNL researchers predicted in 2015 that the cost increase associated with an <br /> ITC reduction would be roughly offset by other solar cost reductions even if the full <br /> reduction to 10% were to be implemented by 2018, rather than spread out through 2022 <br /> as is currently planned. <br /> • The production tax credit has been extended six times from 2000-2014,8 and the solar <br /> ITC has been extended three times since 2007.9 Further tax credit extensions are therefore <br /> plausible. <br /> • The major California investor-owned utilities have significantly slowed their renewable <br /> p rocurement because lower-than-expected customer sales and higher-than-expected <br /> contracting success rates have led to procurement in excess of the RPS requirements <br /> independent news service from Energy Newsdata,from January 2015-January 2016(see issues dated July 31, <br /> August 14,October 16,October 30,2015,and January 15,2016). <br /> 'National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Impact of Federal Tax Policy on Utility-Scale Solar Deployment Given <br /> Financing Interactions,September 28,2015,Slide 16.http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fyl6osti/65014.pdf <br /> 4 Ibid.Costs converted to nominal dollars using the inflation forecast used throughout the rate forecast model(U.S. <br /> EIA's forecast of the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator). <br /> 5 U.S.Department of Energy.Business Energy Investment Tax Credit(ITC). http://energy.gov/savings/business- <br /> energy-investment-tax-credit-itc <br /> 6 U.S.Department of Energy.Electricity Production Tax Credit(PTC). http://energy.gov/savings/renewable- <br /> electricity-production-tax-credit-ptc <br /> National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Impact of Federal Tax Policy on Utility-Scale Solar Deployment Given <br /> Financing Interactions,September 28,2015,Slide 28. <br /> 8 Union of Concerned Scientists.Production Tax Credit for Renewable Energy. <br /> http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/smart-energy-solutions/increase-renewables/production-tax-credit-for.html <br /> 9 Solar Energy Industries Association. Solar Investment Tax Credit. http://www.seia.org/policy/finance-tax/solar- <br /> investment-tax-credit;and U.S.Department of Energy.Business Energy Investment Tax Credit(ITC). <br /> http://energy.gov/savings/b usi ness-energy-i nvestment-tax-credit-itc <br /> July,2016 B-2 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />