22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 3 2017 to 2030 CCA Local Capture on RE As%of County's As%of County's Net Bill Total RE Expected Economic Savings Scenario investments(billion$) investment Activity (billion$) 1 $0.42 44% 0.01% $1.57 2 $0.42 44% 0.01% $1.51 3 $0.45 45% 0.01% $0.52 4 $1.86 49% 0.04%411111111 $0.52 • Table 4 shows high-level results expressed as average annual job changes for the four CCA scenarios. While Scenarios 1 and 2 create nearly identical direct jobs (due to comparable investment in local renewable projects), scenario 1 creates far more TOTAL jobs. This is due to the higher bill savings under scenario 1. Scenario 3 creates a few more direct jobs, but far fewer total jobs, due to decreased bill savings as compared to Scenario 3. The average annual total job impact when compared to Scenario 3 increases by a 2.2-fold factor as a result of CCA customers facing the same level of net rate savings despite the amplified level of renewable investment demand associated with the CCA, particularly for local projects. Table 4: Average Annual Jobs created in Alameda County by the CCA— Direct and Total Impacts 2017—to—2030 County Impacts Local Capture on RE Average Average CCA investments Bill Savings Annual Annual Scenario (billion$) (billion$) DIRECT Jobs TOTAL Jobs 1 $0.42 $1.57 165 1322 2 $0.42 $1.51 166 1286 3 $0.45 $0.52 174 731 Job impacts from building and operating renewable capacity investments in the county account for near 70 percent of annual job creation(compared to the 20 percent in Scenario 1 which had the smallest amount of CCA renewable investments both for the county and elsewhere in the state. It did however have the greatest rate savings to CCA customers). The peak year of impact remains 2023 with the county adding approximately 2,430 jobs. 7