Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Individuals and Communities Self-Selecting 100% Renewables <br /> The existing CCAs all offer customers an option to choose to receive 100% of their power from <br /> renewable resources in exchange for a rate premium. However, each CCA's program is different. <br /> MCE Clean Energy has offered its"Deep Green" at a rate premium of 10/kWh since its <br /> inception. Sonoma Clean Power offers its "Evergreen" option at approximately the same price as <br /> PG&E's"Solar Choice" rate. Lancaster Choice Energy offers its Smart Choice as a fixed <br /> monthly premium rather than a variable rate. In all cases, only a very modest number of CCA <br /> customers—on the order of a few percent—have selected the 100% green rate option. <br /> Table 25. CCA 100% Green Rate Premiums <br /> �o <br /> ate Option Increment Above <br /> Default Rate <br /> Marin Clean Energy Deep Green 1C/kWh <br /> Sonoma Clean Power EverGreen 3.5C/kWh <br /> Lancaster Choice Energy Smart Choice $10/month <br /> Potential Alameda Co. CCA TBD -1.5C/kWh <br /> Any full renewable pricing option offered by the Alameda County CCA would have to be set by <br /> the CCA's management. The value shown in Table 25,–1.50/kWh, is the average incremental <br /> cost of green power used in the CCA supply assessment(Scenario 2) over the study period. <br /> (Initially, it would have to be–1.90/kWh.) Thus the actual number of hypothetical customers <br /> selecting the rate would not impact the economics of the CCA customer who remain on the <br /> standard rate. <br /> • Representatives from at least two communities, Berkeley and Albany, have <br /> expressed interest in having their residents and businesses default onto a 100% <br /> renewable rate. If priced at the cost of incremental renewables, such as is assumed <br /> in Table 25, then there would be no financial impact on the CCA or its remaining <br /> customers. Nonetheless, it could have implications: <br /> • Separate CCA opt-out notifications would be needed. A key feature of the opt- <br /> out notification is the price comparisons against PG&E. As the default rate would <br /> be different for these communities, a different notice would have to be sent. This <br /> would simply increase the start-up cost for the CCA, the increment could be paid <br /> for by the city electing a different default rate. <br /> • Having a higher default rate might increase the number of oft-outs in the <br /> community. <br /> • PG&E's billing system would have to be able to handle city- or zip code-specific <br /> default options. That is, as new residential or businesses move to a self-selected <br /> July,2016 52 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />