Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Chapter 6: Other Risks <br /> Aside from the risks identified above, the CCA or the political jurisdictions that are part of the <br /> CCA could be at risk. This section addresses some of those risks.49 <br /> Financial Risks to CCA Members <br /> A CCA is effectively an association of various political subdivisions. The formation documents <br /> for the CCA define the rights and responsibilities of each member of the CCA. Given the large <br /> number of political subdivisions that might participate in an Alameda County CCA, MRW <br /> assumes that the Alameda County CCA would be formed under a Joint Powers Authority, in <br /> much the same way as MCE Clean Energy and Sonoma Clean Power. <br /> The CCA will ultimately take on various financial obligations. These include obtaining start-up <br /> financing, establishing lines of credit, and entering into contracts with suppliers. Because a CCA <br /> will take on such financial obligations, it is likely very important to the prospective member <br /> political subdivisions that the financial obligations of the CCA cannot be assigned to the <br /> members. <br /> As a result, it is critical that the Joint Powers Authority and any other structuring documents are <br /> carefully drafted to ensure that the member agencies are not jointly obligated on behalf of the <br /> CCA (unless a member agency chooses to bear such obligations). The CCA should obtain <br /> competent legal assistance when developing the formation documents.5° <br /> Procurement-Related Risks <br /> Because a CCA is responsible for procurement of supply for its customers, the CCA must <br /> develop a portfolio of supply that meets the resource preferences of its customers(e.g., ratio of <br /> renewable versus non-renewable supply) while controlling risks (e.g.,ratio of short-term versus <br /> long-term purchase agreements) and meeting regulatory mandates (e.g., resource adequacy and <br /> RPS requirements). Thus, it is tempting to assume that customers would prefer a fully hedged <br /> supply portfolio. However, such insurance comes at a cost and a CCA must be mindful of the <br /> potential competition from PG&E. As a result, the CCA's portfolio must be both flexible while <br /> meeting the needs of its customers. <br /> The CCA will likely need to negotiate a flexible supply arrangement with its initial set of <br /> suppliers. Such an arrangement is important since the CCA's loads are highly uncertain during <br /> CCA ramp-up. Without such an arrangement, the CCA faces the risk of either under- or over- <br /> procuring renewable or non-renewable supplies. Excessive mismatches between supply and <br /> demand of these different products would expose the CCA's customers to major purchases or <br /> sales in the spot markets. These spot purchases could have a major impact on the CCA's <br /> financials. <br /> 49 Note that this section does not provide legal opinion regarding specific risks,especially those related to the <br /> formation or the structure of the Joint Powers Authority under which MRW assumes the CCA will be established. <br /> 50 Cities such as El Cerrito and Benicia have conducted legal analyses when they were considering joining MCE. <br /> which should also be consulted. <br /> July,2016 44 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />