My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> County Job impact by Stage of Job generation, Scenario 1 <br /> Job changes typically start from a direct productive event that alters the need for labor, such as <br /> constructing a facility or opening/closing a business. Then there are the local cycles of business- <br /> to-business supplier transactions that follow (called indirect jobs), cycles of household spending <br /> from the direct and indirect paychecks (called induced jobs), and sometimes there are job <br /> changes due to changes in costs (rates) of a location which affect doing-business in the county. <br /> These are job impacts from competitiveness effects. The indirect and induced combined are <br /> referred to as multiplier effects. The total job impact reflects the direct, the multiplier, and the <br /> competitiveness effects. Figure 25 juxtaposes the county's direct job impacts with the total job <br /> impacts from Scenario 1. The majority of job creation in the scenario is from non-direct <br /> economic influences - specifically from the net rate savings which drives approximately 76 <br /> percent of the county's job gain (Figure 26). As shown in Appendix E, Scenario 2 would have <br /> an identical profile of direct jobs but a slightly lower total job profile, due to almost $60 million <br /> of curtailed net rate savings (relative to scenario 1) through 2030. Scenario 3 has a slightly <br /> higher direct job profile but a greatly reduced total job impact profile. <br /> Figure 25. CCA Scenario 1 County Job Impacts <br /> •Direct is Total <br /> 2500 <br /> 2000 <br /> Ln 1500 <br /> coo <br /> 1000 <br /> 500 <br /> 0 .11 II 11 II <br /> J <br /> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 <br /> July,2016 38 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.