Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Table 7. Scenario 2 Savings for Residential CCA Customers <br /> Monthly Bill with <br /> Bill with PG&E <br /> Residential Consumption Alameda Savings($) Savings(%) <br /> (kWh) ($) County CCA($) <br /> 2017 650 147 146 1 1% <br /> 2020 650 160 147 13 8% <br /> 2030 650 201 188 13 6% <br /> GHG Emissions <br /> The Alameda County CCA's GHG emissions under Scenario 2 are much lower than those under <br /> Scenario 1. This is due to the higher renewable content in the CCA's generation mix under <br /> Scenario, as well as the 50%hydro content in the non-renewable generation mix. <br /> Figure 18 compares the GHG emissions from 2017-2030 for the Alameda County CCA under <br /> Scenario 2 with what PG&E's emissions would be for the same load if no CCA is formed. The <br /> Alameda County CCA's emissions increase from 2017 to 2019 as the CCA is phased in across <br /> the entire county, and then remain flat through 2030. PG&E's GHG emissions are initially <br /> slightly lower than the CCA's emissions, but as the CCA's emissions flatten out, PG&E's <br /> emissions follow a generally upward trend and surpass CCA emissions in 2024, with the <br /> expected retirement of Diablo Canyon in 2025—further bumping up PG&E's emissions by <br /> approximately 30% in 2025. Following this, PG&E's emissions are expected to decrease from <br /> 2026 to 2030 as PG&E procures renewables to meet its mandated RPS goals. However, they still <br /> remain higher than the CCA's expected GHG emissions. <br /> Note that the analysis assumes "normal"hydroelectric output for PG&E. during the drought <br /> years, PG&E's hydro output has been at about 50%of normal, and the utility has made up these <br /> lost megawatt-hours through additional gas generation. This means that our PG&E emissions are <br /> the PG&E emissions shown here are lower that the "current" emission. If, as is expected by <br /> many experts, the recent drought conditions are closer to the new normal, then PG&E's GHG <br /> emissions in the first 8 years would be approximately 30% higher, resulting in GHG savings for <br /> Scenario 2 rather than parity. <br /> July,2016 22 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />