22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County until it drops off completely in the late 2030s. MRW's forecast of the residential PCIA charge through 2030 is summarized in Table 4. Table 4. PG&E Residential PCIA Charges, 0/kWh (nominal) 2015 2018 2020 2025 2030 2.3 2.5 2.2 1.1 0.9 Pro Forma Elements and CCA Costs of Service MRW conducted a pro forma analysis to evaluate the expected financial performance of the CCA and the CCA's competitive position vis a vis PG&E. The analysis was conducted on a forward looking basis from the expected start of CCA operations in 2017 through the year 2030, with several scenarios considered to address uncertainty in future circumstances. Pro Forma Elements Figure 13 provides a schematic of the pro forma analysis, outlining the input elements of the analysis and the output results. The analysis involves a comparison between the generation- related costs that would be paid by Alameda County CCA customers and the generation-related costs that would be paid by PG&E bundled service customers. Costs paid by CCA customers include all CCA-related costs (i.e., supply portfolio costs, net energy efficiency costs,29 and administrative and general costs) and exit fee payments that CCA customers will be required to make to PG&E. As discussed in previous sections, supply portfolio costs and energy efficiency program costs are informed and affected by CCA loads, by the requirements the CCA will need to meet(or will choose to meet) such as with respect to renewable procurement, and by CCA participation levels, which can vary depending on whether or not all cities in the county choose to join the CCA. Administrative and general costs are discussed further below. 29 We anticipate that Alameda County CCA's energy efficiency costs will be fully offset by Public Benefits Charge revenue provided by PG&E for the purpose of energy efficiency programming and that net costs to Alameda County CCA will be zero. July,2016 14 MRW&Associates,LLC