Laserfiche WebLink
and climate goals; however, joining the CCA presents risks that should be further <br /> assessed. ESA found shortcomings in the Study's rate forecasting and its assessment of <br /> hydropower risks (availability and costs) and the risk of high-cost renewables1 creating <br /> competitive and rate disadvantage for the CCA. ESA advises that further research should <br /> be conducted on some of the load forecasting and GHG savings estimates, which may <br /> be overly optimistic as presented in the Study. ESA also recommends that Pleasanton be <br /> cautious about joining the CCA without further study of the rate design, utility exit fees, <br /> and the cost premium for local (in County) renewable energy projects and the ability of <br /> the CCA to finance those projects. Lastly, ESA further recommends benchmarking the <br /> Alameda CCA against existing Bay Area CCAs (Marin Clean Energy, Sonoma Clean <br /> Power, and Lancaster Choice Energy) to evaluate the strategies and approached used <br /> to provide their customers with a cost competitive and cleaner alternative to PG&E power. <br /> Additional information on Community Choice Aggregation in Alameda County can be <br /> found on the County's website at http://www.acgov.org/cda/planninq/cca/index.htm. <br /> Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approv d by: <br /> \\\. Ad g fil <br /> Kathleen Yurchak Dan Sodergren Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Operations and City Attorney City Manager <br /> Water Utilities <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Technical Feasibility Study for Community Choice Aggregation Program in <br /> Alameda County. <br /> 2. ESA Community Development Memo <br /> I defined as energy that is collected from resources which are naturally replenished on a human timescale,such as sun- <br /> light,wind,rain,tides,waves,and geothermal heat. Renewable energy often provides energy in four important areas:electricity <br /> generation,air and water heating/cooling,transportation,and rural(off-grid)energy services <br /> Page 4of4 <br />