My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Chapter 2: Economic Study Methodology and Key Inputs <br /> The section summarizes the key inputs and methodologies used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness <br /> and cost-competitiveness of the CCA under different scenarios. It considers the requirements that <br /> an Alameda County CCA would need to meet, the resources that the County has available or <br /> could obtain to meet these requirements, and the PG&E rates that the CCA would be competing <br /> against. It also describes the pro forma analysis methodology that is used to evaluate the <br /> financial feasibility of the CCA. <br /> Understanding the interrelationships of all the tasks and using consistent and coherent <br /> assumptions throughout are critical to delivering a quality work product. Figure 1 shows the <br /> analysis elements(blue boxes) and major assumptions(red ovals) and how they relate to each <br /> other. As the figure illustrates, there are numerous integrations between the tasks. For example, <br /> the load forecast is a function of not only the load analysis,but also of projections of economic <br /> activity in the county and outcome of the energy efficiency analysis. <br /> Two important points are highlighted in this figure. First, it is critical that wholesale power <br /> market and prices assumptions are consistent between the CCA and PG&E. While there are <br /> reasons that one might have lower or higher costs than the other for a particular product(e.g., <br /> CCAs can use tax-free debt to finance generation projects while PG&E cannot), both will <br /> participate in the wider Western US gas and power markets and therefore will be subject to the <br /> same underlying market forces. To apply power cost assumptions to the CCA than to PG&E, <br /> such as simply escalating PG&E rates while deriving the CCA rates using a bottom-up approach, <br /> will result in erroneous results. Second,virtually all elements of the analysis feed into the <br /> economic and jobs assessment. As is described in detail in Chapter 5, the Study here uses a state- <br /> of-the art macroeconomic model that can account for numerous activities in the economy, which <br /> allows for a much more comprehensive—and accurate—assessment than a simple input-output <br /> model. <br /> July,2016 3 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.