My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Sensitivity Analysis <br /> In addition to the base case forecast described above, MRW assessed alternative cases to <br /> evaluate the sensitivity of the results to possible conditions that could impact the Alameda <br /> County CCA's rate competitiveness. The key factors are summarized in Table ES-2. <br /> Table ES-2. <br /> actor Sensitivity Chang:- <br /> Relicensing Diablo Canyon6 Increases PG&E's generation rates by' 30%' <br /> Increased cost of renewable power 10% higher through 2021, 20% higher in 2021 <br /> and 2022,and 30% higher after 2022 <br /> High PCIA("exit fee") Retains the high PCIA expected in 2018 <br /> (2.1C/kWh) through 2030 <br /> US Energy Information Administration's High Gas <br /> High Natural Gas Prices Price Scenario, which is about 60% higher than <br /> the base case price <br /> Low PG&E Rates PG&E rates 10% lower than base forecast <br /> Stress Scenario Combined impact of high renewable costs, high <br /> PCIA, high gas price and low PG&E rates. <br /> The sensitivity results are shown as the difference between the annual average PG&E generation <br /> rate and the Alameda County CCA rates and are shown in Figure ES-7. Scenario 1 (RPS <br /> Compliance)is the least costly scenario for the CCA and therefore has the highest rate <br /> differentials under most of the sensitivity cases considered. Scenario 2 (Accelerated RPS), <br /> though still quite competitive with PG&E, fares slightly worse, with a rate differential typically <br /> about 8% lower than in Scenario 1. Scenario 3 (80%RPS by 2021)has the highest renewable <br /> content and is the costliest scenario, with rate differentials much lower than those in the other <br /> two scenarios. While Scenario 3 is anticipated to be competitive with PG&E in most cases(on <br /> average),the margins are much lower, particularly in the"High Renewable Prices"sensitivity <br /> 6 Between when this study was conducted and the final report released,PG&E announced its intention to retire <br /> Diablo Canyon at the end of its current license and replace it with storage,energy efficiency and renewables. <br /> Qualitatively,if we replaced DC with storage,energy efficiency and renewables,the net result would be PG&E <br /> costs that are between the base PG&E cost and the Diablo Canyon Relicense). <br /> The new cooling system,which would be required per state regulations implementing the Federal Clean Water <br /> Act,Section 316(b),would alone have an estimated cost of$4.5 billion.It is because of these very high costs that <br /> the base case assumes the that power plant is retired. <br /> 8The Alameda County CCA rate includes the PG&E exit fees(PCIA charges)that will be charged to CCA <br /> customers but does not include the rate adjustment for the reserve fund. <br /> July 2016 ix MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.