My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> CCA Power Supplies <br /> The CCA's primary function is to procure power supplies to meet the electrical loads of its <br /> customers. This requires balancing energy supply and demand on an hourly basis. It also requires <br /> procuring generating capacity(i.e., the ability to provide energy when needed)to ensure that <br /> customer loads can be met reliably. By law, the CCA must supply a certain portion of its sales to <br /> customers from eligible renewable resources. This Renewable Portfolio Standard(RPS), requires <br /> 33%renewable energy supply by 2020, increasing to 50%by 2030. The CCA may choose to <br /> procure a greater share of its supply from renewable sources than the minimum requirements, or <br /> may seek to otherwise reduce the environmental impact of its supply portfolio (e.g.,purchase <br /> hydroelectric power rather than power from a fossil fuel generator). <br /> The three supply scenarios that we considered are: <br /> 1. Minimum RPS Compliance: The CCA meets the state-mandated 33% RPS requirement <br /> in 2020 and the 50% RPS requirement in 2030 <br /> 2. More Aggressive: The CCA's supply portfolio is set at 50% RPS from the first year <br /> onward,plus additional amounts of non-RPS compliant large hydro power to reduce <br /> GHG emissions <br /> 3. Ultra-Low GHG: The CCA's supply portfolio is set at 50% RPS in the first year and <br /> increases to 80% RPS by the fifth year. <br /> In each case, we assumed that the RPS portfolio was predominately supplied with solar and wind <br /> resources, which are currently the lowest cost sources of renewable energy in California. We <br /> assumed that solar and wind each contribute 45% of the renewable energy supply. To provide <br /> resource diversity and partly address the need for supply at times when solar and wind <br /> production are low, we assumed the remaining 10% of renewable supply would be provided by <br /> higher-cost baseload resources, such as geothermal or biomass. <br /> Local Renewable Development <br /> The CCA may choose to contract with or develop renewable projects within Alameda County so <br /> as to promote economic development or reap other benefits. For the purpose of this study, we <br /> assume that the local renewable power development resulting from the CCA would be largely <br /> solar. In developing the hypothetical portfolios, we made conservative assumptions about how <br /> much local solar development would occur as a result of the CCA. A renewable potential study <br /> performed for the California Public Utilities Commission(CPUC) estimated roughly 300 MW of <br /> large solar supply in Alameda County. (Large solar in this study means ground-mounted utility- <br /> scale solar farms).1 This estimate is based on an assessment that five percent of the estimated <br /> 6,000 MW of technical potential could be developed, largely as a result of land use conflicts or <br /> slope issues that would make solar development unfeasible in certain areas. We assume that <br /> over the forecast period through 2030, about 1/3 of the estimated 300 MW large solar supply <br /> potential in Alameda County is developed as a result of commitments by the CCA. Additional <br /> in-county, small solar projects are assumed to be added at 5-10 MW per year. <br /> At about 8-10 acres per megawatt,this corresponds to 2,400 to 3,000 acres(3.75-4.7 square miles). <br /> July 2016 iii MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.