My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Executive Summary <br /> California Assembly Bill 117,passed in 2002, established Community Choice Aggregation in <br /> California, for the purpose of providing the opportunity for local governments or special <br /> jurisdictions to procure or provide electric power for their residents and businesses. In June <br /> 2014, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to allocate funding to <br /> explore the creation of a Community Choice Aggregation(CCA) Program called East Bay <br /> Community Energy(EBCE) and directed County staff to undertake the steps necessary to <br /> evaluate the feasibility of a CCA. This feasibility study is in response to this Board Action. <br /> In order to assess whether a CCA is "feasible" in Alameda County, the local objectives must be <br /> laid out and understood. Based on the specifications of the initial request for proposals and input <br /> from the County, this study: <br /> • Quantifies the electric loads that an Alameda County CCA would have to serve <br /> • Estimates the costs to start-up and operate the CCA <br /> • Considers scenarios with differing assumptions concerning the amount of carbon-free <br /> power being supplied to the CCA so as to assess the costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) <br /> emissions reductions possible with the CCA <br /> • Includes analysis of in-county renewable generation <br /> • Compares the rates that could be offered by the CCA to PG&E's rates <br /> • Quantitatively explores the rate competiveness to key input variables, such as the cost of <br /> natural gas <br /> • Explores what activities a CCA might take with respect to administering customer-side <br /> energy efficiency programs <br /> • Calculates the macroeconomic development and employment benefits of CCA formation. <br /> Loads and Forecast <br /> Figure ES-1 provides a snapshot of Alameda County electric load in 2014 by city and by rate <br /> class. As the figure shows, total electricity load in 2014 from Alameda County was <br /> approximately 8,000 GWh. The cities of Oakland, Fremont, and Hayward were together <br /> responsible for half the county load, with Berkeley, San Leandro, and Pleasanton also <br /> contributing substantially. Residential and commercial customers made up the majority of the <br /> county load, with smaller contributions from the industrial and public sectors. <br /> To forecast CCA loads through 2030, MRW used a 0.3% annual average growth rate, which is <br /> consistent with the California Energy Commission's most recent electricity demand forecast for <br /> PG&E's planning area. This growth rate incorporates load reductions from the CCA's energy <br /> efficiency programs of about 6 GWh per year from 2021 through 2030. Figure ES-2 shows this <br /> forecast by class, with the energy efficiency savings that are included in the forecast indicated by <br /> the top (yellow) segment. <br /> July 2016 i MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.