My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:27:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT A <br /> I <br /> QUANTITY <br /> BACKGROUND AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES HYDROGEOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> l r I Rec.• de Options <br /> Lit Review of <br /> In-Valley Identify Re `ode R d Op o <br /> Potable Reuse Wastewater Alternatives for • Background Model - Treatment <br /> Projects, Available - -♦ • Source —► Review ► Infrastructure <br /> Technologies (Seasonal and • Treatment 7 • Chain of Lakes • Locations <br /> - Future) I • End Use/Location Evaluation <br /> Review of <br /> • Groundwater <br /> Existing Walley Out-of-Valley I I Model Work Plan <br /> Documents Wastewater __ + • Model Runs • <br /> Available Evaluate and i — <br /> Screen Alts.to • <br /> Public Health/ Short-List -4- Localized A• •sis <br /> Regulatory Treatment _- -- —* • Site Suitablility r Funding Opportunities <br /> Framework Evaluation i • Recharge Rates <br /> and Policy ) • Water Quality <br /> Discussions Develop Alternatives Recommended Actions <br /> Water Balance Desktop Analysis <br /> • Layouts • Mobilization Testing/Piloting <br /> - (Recovery,Reject, - • Costs Source Control <br /> Define Quality,Yields) ' • Plugging Potential <br /> Planning Goals/ I I • O&M Water Quality Mitigation <br /> Decision Criteria LAVWMA • Outstanding Issues I Hydrogeology Testing <br /> Impacts/ _ • Benefits/Impacts Refine Yields,Quantity <br /> Constraints ____r_______, Available <br /> • <br /> Kickoff/ t^' gyp#3 Workshe� °4 ^�'crkshc �� 5 Board/ <br /> Workshop#1 Agency 1 <br /> Identify Source • Identify • Hydrogeology Review Findings Pre, 'ations <br /> • Review Quantity,Quality Alternatives Findings of Alternatives <br /> Background Treatment • Combine Source, Review Develop • <br /> • Industry History Options Treatment, Screening of <br /> Recommenda- <br /> tions <br /> • Set Goals • Potential Water End Use Alternatives tions <br /> • Define Decision Quality • Preliminary • Determine • Develop Plan to <br /> Process/Criteria Concerns/ Hydrogeology Shortlist of Move Forward <br /> Impacts Discussion Alternatives to <br /> • Identify Concerns Evaluate Further <br /> and Potential <br /> Mitigation <br /> Report <br /> TM1 Review <br /> Industry Review Meeting <br /> of <br /> Potable Reuse TM3 TM6 <br /> Water Potable Hydrogeological Development Final <br /> Availability Reuse Feasibility of Short Listed TriValley <br /> Balance and Options and and Alternatives (Port <br /> Public Health Quality Screening Water Quality and Rep <br /> Goals and Process Assessment i Evaluation <br /> Regulatory --- ': - .• <br /> Framework TriValley <br /> IPR <br /> Report <br /> acfc0916rwl.a <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.