SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - Laserfiche WebLink

"Staff believed that these measures,when instituted,would help to address many of the concerns raised by the Millers." Millers'response: (Previously communicated to staff in the Millers'Jan. 28 hearing rebuttal.) • This is incorrect.These measures did not address the Millers'concern.The Masons' proposal allows sixteen days for commercial outdoor events (the actual number of parties could be greater if a child's party is held during the day and adult party at night)and an unlimited number of outdoor Masonic events per year, totaling perhaps 20 or 30 parties per year. Furthermore,there was no mechanism to determine if a party was commercial or Masonic. Would you be happy if your neighbor conducted 20 to 30 noisy parties a year? We doubt staff would be, and neither would you. 9. On Page 7,staff states: "Staff contacted the President of the Masonic Center, and was informed that the indoor space was used by a group of[Masonic] women engaging in quilting, and the quilters' children were playing outside.The Masonic Center building was not rented that day and there were no organized activities. Staff responded to the Millers in writing on November 26, 2013 that the activities on November 12 did not constitute an exceedance of the thresholds in the Noise Ordinance.The noise ordinances restrictions apply to voices using machines (microphone, amplifier, loudspeaker,etc.).Thus, non- amplified human voice noise is not a noise violation." Millers' response: (Previously communicated to staff in the Millers'Jan. 28 hearing rebuttal.) This is correct. However,since this was a Mason only party,this demonstrates that Masonic parties can still be extreme noise nuisances, as in this case when 25 Masonic children were running around screaming in the backyard. Furthermore,this is the first time that the Millers discovered that City staff was interpreting the noise codes to exclude voices, an interpretation that is nonsensical on its face. Unwanted human voices are actually more disruptive according to the Millers' sound engineer. That is why most cities place even greater restriction on human voices than on machine noise. And since staff is claiming that the noise codes don't include voices, residents have no protection against these types of events. 10. On Page 7, staff states: "March 2016—May 2016—the Millers filed complaints similar to previous complaints concerning noise and uses of the Masonic Center. Staff responded in writing and concluded that no violations had occurred (see Exhibit L of Attachment 5)."