My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there are periods when the noise is really loud. There are periods when the noise is not <br />so loud. So that's sort of the basis for our long- standing interpretation that non - amplified <br />human noise does not exceed the thresholds in the noise ordinance. <br />In regard to the Raley's example, that was a really different situation. That was a rare <br />parking area being proposed for conversion into an outdoor play area where no outdoor <br />play area previously existed. And staff's recommendation to deny that application in that <br />situation was primarily based on the fact that the proposal posed safety concerns. The <br />back area in the back of the Raley's shopping center was used frequently for drop -off's <br />and pickups and deliveries so there were big semi - trucks moving back there through <br />that back alley behind the shopping center that we could see potential collisions <br />occurring between those trucks and the fenced outdoor area being proposed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: That was one of the issues, but we also mentioned the noise <br />which was the second issue. <br />Weinstein: Yes, absolutely. Noise was a problem as well. I don't believe we indicated <br />the noise levels there would exceed the noise ordinance. That wasn't a claim that we <br />made during that discussion, but we acknowledged that just like we're talking about <br />tonight, noise can be an irritant along with activity levels, along with the other things we <br />talked about before like lighting; that even though there wasn't necessarily going to be <br />an exceedance of the noise ordinance, that was a consideration; that noise generation <br />at that location was something worth considering in denying the application. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: The City wouldn't claim that we've never enforced the code <br />against a large party that has too much noise, would they? <br />Weinstein: Yes, so there's another provision that often is enforced in relation to noise <br />and that's disturbance of the peace. That's completely separate from exceedances of <br />the noise ordinance and that's a call that police get often and typically what happens <br />when somebody has a little party in the backyard that disturbs the peace, a neighbor <br />might call the police. The police will come and talk to the neighbor and talk to the person <br />that's generating the noise and seek some resolution. So that's a separate action that's <br />taken independent of our noise ordinance. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So if that's the case, why does the code enforcement officer <br />not enforce this provision of the noise ordinance? Why haven't they talked to the <br />Mason's when they have these parties? Why do they just say they don't enforce it <br />because it's voices? <br />Weinstein: Our code enforcement officer is here and he can speak to specific examples, <br />but the point I would want to make is that since 2008 City staff have interjected <br />themselves into the complaints that are occurring, the complaints that the Millers are <br />raising about the Masonic Lodge. So back in 2008 and 2009, City staff met with the <br />Masonic Lodge. We sent them letters when we were notified of the big party that was <br />planned to happen to try to get some correction of what was happening and our <br />involvement in the dispute has continued from 2009 on. So I think we have been closely <br />involved. The issues that we've been involved with haven't always centered on <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 7 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.