My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: Just say "outdoor ancillary buildings are permitted in <br />conformance with the code up to three. Any over three requires permission from the <br />City." <br />Chair Ritter: How many do they have right now, five? <br />Weinstein: Yes, something like that. <br />Commissioner Balch: Is there a health, safety or concern about the five that they have? <br />Weinstein: They just don't look that great. They're portable sheds or semi - portable and <br />they're old. The paint is peeling and they don't look that great. I think Commissioner <br />Nagler's idea of limiting the accessory structures to three or something like that is good <br />and so they can consolidate what they have. Even if they are a little old looking and the <br />paint's not that great, having three instead of five or having two instead of five would be <br />a lot better than what it is now. So we would recommend that. <br />Chair Ritter: Three. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'm not there personally, but you guys....1 can't see requiring a <br />structure to be removed because it's old and it has chipped paint and that they did it to <br />annoy others. It might be just fine with me frankly. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: But Jack, it could be approved if it was slightly and not <br />unsightly. It could be. They just need approval. <br />Commissioner Balch: You don't have to get me there but I'm not there. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay Mr. Chair, what do you want to do on this? <br />Chair Ritter: We've just got to get it with three and move on and they need to get a <br />permit for more and let that process happen. Number 45. <br />Commissioner Balch: Done, because you need that now. 46 is good and 47 as well. <br />Weinstein: Sorry, could I just suggest one additional condition and it was related to <br />something that Mike Miller brought to our attention and that's that some of the <br />accessory structures are possibly being used for cooking, so I think we just need to <br />make clear as part of our new Condition 44.a. that the ancillary structure shall only be <br />used for storage. <br />Chair Ritter: Absolutely. <br />Commissioner Balch: They're large enough for that? <br />Chair Ritter: So they're cooking inside it? <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 51 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.