My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor: I heard that from other neighbors tonight and I don't see that <br />as a Miller vs. Mason issue I don't think but I could be wrong. But I heard that from other <br />residents in the neighborhood, so I think other people had some issues with it. <br />Commissioner Balch: So maybe staff can weigh in on that. Was the catering business <br />part of the CUP concern with the ancillary uses I guess? <br />Weinstein: My impression is that concerns regarding the catering use were mainly a <br />function of the fact that occasionally catering employees were going outside and <br />smoking, so again, that's something that could be restricted. I mean obviously there are <br />some options there, right? You can get rid of catering completely as a use that's <br />allowed on the site. You could restrict it further, but my impression was that the concern <br />about catering was primarily in regards to employees going outside. <br />Commissioner Balch: I guess it had some impact on the outside buildings. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I think those are storage buildings for the caterers. <br />Commissioner Allen: They are. I just went by it. Two of them are, yes, they have <br />catering materials there. <br />Chair Ritter: So Item D is okay? <br />Commissioner Balch: I think the concept that we're trying to figure out is that from my <br />view, if they're cooking inside the building and exiting through the building from the <br />southern portion to go elsewhere, I can see that as an ancillary use. I'm not having a <br />problem. Where I don't understand and what I don't know with the site is, as you <br />mentioned, due to the exterior use of the backyard, that northern side.... <br />Commissioner O'Connor: The only other thing I can see is there could be some other <br />issues from events going off the roof. I don't know or think they incurred any problems. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I'm fine with the catering business that's relatively small. So you <br />can define it by the number of employees.... <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I know we closed the public hearing, but I see a few <br />people shaking heads like maybe the catering is an issue. I'm not sure if we.... <br />Commissioner Nagler: I think at this point we're trying to decide. Let's keep going. <br />Chair Ritter: Hours of operation? <br />Commissioner Balch: So this is important because this is inside the building, right? If <br />they use the patio and doors, the portion becomes moot so we just say that's out. <br />Part 2. I'm on number 2 on page 2; Use of the Mason Lodge building inside, use of the <br />patio and outdoor areas. I'm fine with staff's recommendation on the inside and we'll <br />move on. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 37 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.