06 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

What needs to happen is that the backyard needs to be put back to the way it was. It's supposed to be a buffer between their property, their uses and the residents. The back entrances should be replaced by solid doors and not glass doors and they should be used for emergency exit only. The patio should be removed or put the patio on the southern side where it's supposed to be and there shouldn't be any party rentals of the facility, certainly not outdoor party rentals. Thank you. Darlene Miller: Commissioners, after nine years it's great to be here. First, we have detrimental impacts to our health, safety, welfare and property because of these outdoor parties. We have borne the brunt of the lodge's abuses since we are the only neighbor who shares a fence line with them. Specifically, we cannot use our backyard when the Masons are having parties because the noise is deafening. We are being denied our enjoyment of our property and the peace of our home. Furthermore, the noise is so loud that it makes it difficult for us to think, read, work or even sleep. I actually video -taped the Chabad party recently from the inside of our upstairs bedroom. We didn't bring it tonight because our noise engineer said it wasn't calibrated but you could easily hear my voice in relation to the noise and you can hear the roar of the party inside our upstairs bedroom. I want that to sink in. Our property damage has been estimated to be 3% to 5% or possibly 100% if we can't sell it to anybody because of this noise nuisance behind our home. Point number two, staff clearly saw the problem of outdoor noise residence in the Young Ivy case. I know it's been discussed but let me remind staff of what they wrote in their own staff report. will quote: "The introduction of the outdoor playground area with up to 16 children and no significant sound attenuation could result in increased ambient noise levels" and staff denied the playground because of that. Comparing Young Ivy to the Masons, Young Ivy has 16 children. The Masons has 115 to 600 people. Young Ivy has 60 to 80 feet away from the neighbors. The Masons has zero. Young Ivy has four hours of outdoor activity. The Masons have 12. It's obvious that staff can clearly see the problems with ambient noise. We are confused and that's putting it politely as to why we are not being given the same consideration as the neighbors of Young Ivy were. Point number 3: the City says that the CUP is not clear but we say the CUP is perfectly clear. The problem is that staff has not enforced this. The points of the CUP works is that we've lived next to the Masons for 20 years without complaints and the Masons made good money; $75,000 to $90,000 per year but they wanted more money so they rented out the backyard, very entrepreneurial of them. We are guessing that the residents in Pleasanton and maybe some of them can speak to this would also like to make a little bit more money by renting out their backyards. I'm sure that you've heard of Airbnb. Staff, have you heard of Airbnb, the Internet company where neighbors can rent out a room in their house for money? Well, we would like to suggest to staff that they create "air backyard" where neighbors can rent their backyards for parties. Oh, wait a minute, that's not allowed for residents, but the Masons can do it. Number 4: the goal of the CUP is to make the Masons act like a neighbor. Commercial parties in the backyard is not acting like a neighbor. Did you know that most Masonic lodges are in commercial areas? And that the very few who are in residential areas do not rent out their backyards? Your neighbor might have an occasional large party in the EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 14 of 52